Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

MARBAT

IMO
9365752
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
269,087 t
Port of registry
Majuro
Technical efficiency
EIV 4.14 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 269,087 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
248.1 kg/nm
Oil tanker median 128.8 kg/nm (+93%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
2.89
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.86 (−67%)
Average speed
8.6 kn
Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−20%)
Fuel per day at sea
50.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
4,719 t
CO₂ emitted
14,790 t
Distance sailed
19,018 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,223 h
93 days, 25% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2021

Set against all 1,789 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2021 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 248.1 kg/nm · median 128.8 (+93%)
76.5Ranks 1,748 of 1,789, lowest first194.0
Average speedThis ship 8.6 kn · median 10.7 (−20%)
8.1Faster than 14% of oil tanker ships12.3
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 2.89 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.86 (−67%)
4.75Ranks 20 of 1,789, lowest first25.20
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports5%
  • From the EU73%
  • Into the EU17%
  • At berth in the EU5%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
5.2%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • MARBAT
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • MARBAT
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MARBAT
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2019→2021−3.8 kn−2%−32%−49%−4%3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+0.6 kn−5%−0%+27%−27%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2021not published4,71914,79019,0182,2238.6248.12.89–
2019not published9,48729,69237,6533,03612.4252.03.00–
2018not published7,86024,58029,5472,50611.8266.04.13–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2021not published2.898.86−67%20 of 1,789ABSB+C
2019not published3.008.83−66%79 of 1,919ABSB+C
2018not published4.138.86−53%167 of 1,779ABSB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

MARBAT (IMO 9365752): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2021 | Navalyze