MUKADDES KALKAVAN
- IMO
- 9365829
- Type
- Container ship
- Port of registry
- Majuro
- Technical efficiency
- EEXI 16.49 g CO₂/t·nm
- Ice class
- IC
ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: KALKAVAN SHIPMANAGEMENT GmbH & CO. KG
2025 at a glance
From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.
Within the container fleet, 2024
Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.
Where the emissions happen, 2025
THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.
The voyage split is not in this year's report.
Over the years
Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.
Fuel per mile, kg/nm
- MUKADDES KALKAVAN
- Container median
Average speed, kn
- MUKADDES KALKAVAN
- Container median
CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm
- MUKADDES KALKAVAN
- Container median
Year on year
| Year | Speed | Fuel per mile | Fuel per day | Distance | CO₂ per TW | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024→2025 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| 2023→2024 | −0.1 kn | +7% | +6% | +17% | −13% | Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2022→2023 | −0.2 kn | −14% | −15% | −4% | −3% | Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2021→2022 | −0.3 kn | +3% | +1% | −9% | +2% | Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2020→2021 | −0.7 kn | +5% | −0% | +16% | +5% | 0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2019→2020 | +0.4 kn | −0% | +3% | −54% | −4% | 0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2018→2019 | +0.5 kn | +0% | +4% | +28% | −13% | 0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.
Every reporting year
One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.
Operation
| Year | ISM company | Fuel t | CO₂ t | Distance nm | At sea h | Speed kn | Fuel kg/nm | CO₂ g/t·nm | Laden fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | KALKAVAN SHIPMANAGEMENT GmbH & CO. KG | 0 | 0 | – | 0 | – | – | – | – |
| 2024 | KALKAVAN SHIPMANAGEMENT GmbH & CO. KG | 3,552 | 11,071 | 35,563 | 2,727 | 13.0 | 99.9 | 19.66 | – |
| 2023 | not published | 2,860 | 8,912 | 30,476 | 2,329 | 13.1 | 93.8 | 22.55 | – |
| 2022 | not published | 3,459 | 10,777 | 31,595 | 2,377 | 13.3 | 109.5 | 23.36 | 100% |
| 2021 | not published | 3,669 | 11,432 | 34,676 | 2,550 | 13.6 | 105.8 | 22.96 | 100% |
| 2020 | not published | 3,014 | 9,393 | 29,917 | 2,093 | 14.3 | 100.8 | 21.83 | 100% |
| 2019 | not published | 6,531 | 20,371 | 64,493 | 4,649 | 13.9 | 101.3 | 22.71 | – |
| 2018 | not published | 5,075 | 15,838 | 50,281 | 3,762 | 13.4 | 100.9 | 26.25 | 100% |
Benchmark and verification
| Year | ISM company | CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm | Container median | vs Container | Rank | Verifier | Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | KALKAVAN SHIPMANAGEMENT GmbH & CO. KG | – | – | – | – | DNV | A |
| 2024 | KALKAVAN SHIPMANAGEMENT GmbH & CO. KG | 19.66 | 17.52 | +12% | 1,115 of 1,974 | DNV | A |
| 2023 | not published | 22.55 | 19.40 | +16% | 1,107 of 1,899 | DNV | A |
| 2022 | not published | 23.36 | 19.13 | +22% | 1,093 of 1,825 | Verifavia | A |
| 2021 | not published | 22.96 | 17.90 | +28% | 1,115 of 1,781 | Verifavia | A |
| 2020 | not published | 21.83 | 17.58 | +24% | 1,091 of 1,797 | Verifavia | A |
| 2019 | not published | 22.71 | 18.88 | +20% | 1,058 of 1,788 | Verifavia | A |
| 2018 | not published | 26.25 | 20.22 | +30% | 1,078 of 1,705 | Verifavia | A |
Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.