Navalyze · Container · Ship

KAAN KALKAVAN

IMO: 9365879
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 16,337 t
Port of registry: Istanbul
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.29 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: KASIF GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,337 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

117.6 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−34%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.44

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+38%)

Average speed

13.6 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

38.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,274 t

CO₂ emitted

3,970 t

4,032 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

10,829 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

794 h

33 days, 9% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 117.6 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−34%)

78.8Ranks 687 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 13.3 (+2%)

9.1Faster than 55% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 22.44 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+38%)

7.22Ranks 1,453 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU70%
Into the EU30%
At berth in the EU0%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,988 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

KAAN KALKAVAN
Container median

100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KAAN KALKAVAN
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

KAAN KALKAVAN
Container median

0.025.050.075.0100125

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+3%	+6%	−74%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	+8%	+3%	+37%	−13%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−6%	−6%	+21%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+1%	−2%	−30%	−1%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+7%	+12%	+80%	−8%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−1.7 kn	−2%	−14%	+544%	−37%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	+7%	+11%	−73%	−62%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	KASIF GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.	1,274	3,970	10,829	794	13.6	117.6	22.44	–
2024	KASIF GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.	4,727	14,734	41,440	3,120	13.3	114.1	22.81	–
2023	not published	3,213	10,015	30,350	2,175	14.0	105.9	26.31	–
2022	not published	2,825	8,805	24,986	1,800	13.9	113.1	25.15	100%
2021	not published	4,018	12,521	35,775	2,498	14.3	112.3	25.40	100%
2020	not published	2,083	6,492	19,838	1,453	13.7	105.0	27.58	100%
2019	not published	331	1,032	3,079	199	15.4	107.4	43.75	–
2018	not published	1,142	3,556	11,346	763	14.9	100.6	114.25	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	KASIF GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.	22.44	16.30	+38%	1,453 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	KASIF GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.	22.81	17.52	+30%	1,255 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	26.31	19.40	+36%	1,236 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	25.15	19.13	+31%	1,150 of 1,825	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	25.40	17.90	+42%	1,195 of 1,781	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	27.58	17.58	+57%	1,287 of 1,797	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	43.75	18.88	+132%	1,479 of 1,788	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	114.25	20.22	+465%	1,698 of 1,705	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.