Navalyze · Container · Ship

KAAN KALKAVAN

IMO: 9365879
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 16,337 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Istanbul
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.29 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: KASIF GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,780 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

112

Container median 186 kg/nm (−40%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

25.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (+42%)

Average speed

14.3 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

38.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,018 t

CO₂ emitted

12,521 t

Distance sailed

35,775 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,498 h

104 days, 29% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 118 kg/nm · median 177 (−34%)

78.8Ranks 687 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 13.3 (+2%)

9.1Faster than 55% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 22.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+38%)

7.22Ranks 1,453 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU64%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU0%

Fuel burned laden

4,018 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

11 t

0.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

KAAN KALKAVAN
Container median

100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KAAN KALKAVAN
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

KAAN KALKAVAN
Container median

0.025.050.075.0100125

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+3%	+6%	−74%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	+8%	+3%	+37%	−13%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−6%	−6%	+21%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+1%	−2%	−30%	−1%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+7%	+12%	+80%	−8%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−1.7 kn	−2%	−14%	+544%	−37%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	+7%	+11%	−73%	−62%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	KASIF GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.	1,274	3,970	10,829	794	13.6	118	22.4	–
2024	KASIF GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.	4,727	14,734	41,440	3,120	13.3	114	22.8	–
2023	not published	3,213	10,015	30,350	2,175	14.0	106	26.3	–
2022	not published	2,825	8,805	24,986	1,800	13.9	113	25.2	100%
2021	not published	4,018	12,521	35,775	2,498	14.3	112	25.4	100%
2020	not published	2,083	6,492	19,838	1,453	13.7	105	27.6	100%
2019	not published	331	1,032	3,079	199	15.4	107	43.8	–
2018	not published	1,142	3,556	11,346	763	14.9	101	114	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	KASIF GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.	22.4	16.3	+38%	1,453 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	KASIF GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.	22.8	17.5	+30%	1,255 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	26.3	19.4	+36%	1,236 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	25.2	19.1	+31%	1,150 of 1,825	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	25.4	17.9	+42%	1,195 of 1,781	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	27.6	17.6	+57%	1,287 of 1,797	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	43.8	18.9	+132%	1,479 of 1,788	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	114	20.2	+465%	1,698 of 1,705	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.