Navalyze · Container · Ship

X-PRESS MULHACEN

IMO: 9365960
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,287 t
Port of registry: Valetta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 31.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,287 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

79.7 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−55%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

46.80

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+187%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,775 t

CO₂ emitted

11,719 t

11,904 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

47,363 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,167 h

174 days, 48% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 79.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−55%)

78.8Ranks 236 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 13.3 (−14%)

9.1Faster than 25% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 46.80 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+187%)

7.22Ranks 1,985 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports78%
From the EU7%
Into the EU11%
At berth in the EU4%

84% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (9,828 t).

Fuel burned laden

91%

9% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

3.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

X-PRESS MULHACEN
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

X-PRESS MULHACEN
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

X-PRESS MULHACEN
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−1%	−2%	−11%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+10%	+19%	+2%	+32%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	+6%	−5%	−8%	−15%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	−5%	−1%	+4%	+11%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+1%	+1%	−5%	−31%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	−2%	+5%	−22%	−21%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.8 kn	+21%	+3%	−3%	–	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	3,775	11,719	47,363	4,167	11.4	79.7	46.80	91%
2024	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	4,268	13,389	53,134	4,606	11.5	80.3	59.17	84%
2023	not published	3,793	11,962	51,895	4,876	10.6	73.1	44.96	–
2022	not published	3,890	12,444	56,296	4,745	11.9	69.1	53.13	–
2021	not published	3,934	12,491	54,356	4,773	11.4	72.4	47.92	–
2020	not published	4,104	12,840	57,464	5,030	11.4	71.4	69.29	–
2019	not published	5,351	16,782	73,851	6,868	10.8	72.5	87.80	–
2018	not published	4,551	14,348	75,899	6,029	12.6	60.0	39,855,403.61	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	46.80	16.30	+187%	1,985 of 2,208	ABS	A
2024	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	59.17	17.52	+238%	1,848 of 1,974	ABS	A
2023	not published	44.96	19.40	+132%	1,618 of 1,899	Korean Register	A
2022	not published	53.13	19.13	+178%	1,650 of 1,825	Korean Register	A
2021	not published	47.92	17.90	+168%	1,573 of 1,781	Korean Register	A
2020	not published	69.29	17.58	+294%	1,743 of 1,797	Korean Register	A
2019	not published	87.80	18.88	+365%	1,765 of 1,788	Korean Register	A+C
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.