Navalyze · Container · Ship

EGY SKY

IMO: 9366483
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 7,608 t
Flag (estimated): Egypt
Port of registry: Alexandria
Technical efficiency: EEXI 23.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC
Former names: ASIATIC ISLAND

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: AKKAD SHIPPING (AK SHIPS)

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,358 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

84.6

Container median 186 kg/nm (−54%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

49.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (+178%)

Average speed

13.3 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,304 t

CO₂ emitted

23,024 t

Distance sailed

86,333 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,506 h

271 days, 74% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 46.9 kg/nm · median 177 (−74%)

78.8Ranks 7 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 6.4 kn · median 13.3 (−52%)

9.1Faster than 2% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 19.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+18%)

7.22Ranks 1,307 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU32%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

488 t

2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EGY SKY
Container median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EGY SKY
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EGY SKY
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.8 kn	−7%	−42%	−81%	−12%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−4.1 kn	−38%	−56%	−69%	−51%	4.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 38%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.9 kn	−7%	+7%	−6%	−3%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	+3%	−3%	−19%	−8%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+12%	+12%	+1%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−8%	−9%	+29%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.6 kn	+15%	+32%	+5%	+18%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	AKKAD SHIPPING (AK SHIPS)	175	548	3,733	585	6.4	46.9	19.3	–
2024	AKKAD SHIPPING (AK SHIPS)	1,012	3,166	20,086	1,962	10.2	50.4	22.0	92%
2023	not published	5,328	16,618	65,646	4,588	14.3	81.2	44.6	95%
2022	not published	6,096	19,006	70,031	5,632	12.4	87.0	45.7	94%
2021	not published	7,304	23,024	86,333	6,506	13.3	84.6	49.8	–
2020	not published	6,451	20,336	85,537	6,421	13.3	75.4	46.5	–
2019	not published	5,468	17,042	66,364	4,977	13.3	82.4	49.3	–
2018	not published	4,546	14,169	63,430	5,442	11.7	71.7	41.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	AKKAD SHIPPING (AK SHIPS)	19.3	16.3	+18%	1,307 of 2,208	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2024	AKKAD SHIPPING (AK SHIPS)	22.0	17.5	+25%	1,224 of 1,974	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2023	not published	44.6	19.4	+130%	1,607 of 1,899	ABS	–
2022	not published	45.7	19.1	+139%	1,551 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	49.8	17.9	+178%	1,601 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	46.5	17.6	+164%	1,567 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	49.3	18.9	+161%	1,536 of 1,788	DNV	A+B
2018	not published	41.7	20.2	+106%	1,374 of 1,705	DNV	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.