Navalyze · Container · Ship

VIVIENNE SHERI D

IMO: 9371426
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,083 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 23.30 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: PICTOR J, PICTOR

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Doornekamp Shipping Ltd.

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,445 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

94.3

Container median 178 kg/nm (−47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

55.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+190%)

Average speed

14.3 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,172 t

CO₂ emitted

19,786 t

Distance sailed

65,426 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,585 h

191 days, 52% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 89.6 kg/nm · median 177 (−49%)

78.8Ranks 395 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 13.3 (+4%)

9.1Faster than 57% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 56.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+247%)

7.22Ranks 2,089 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU57%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

427 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VIVIENNE SHERI D
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VIVIENNE SHERI D
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VIVIENNE SHERI D
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+4%	+4%	−3%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.5 kn	−4%	+7%	+13%	−16%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.0 kn	−5%	−18%	−7%	+18%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	+0%	+3%	+3%	−3%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	−10%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+8.0 kn	+1%	+132%	+100%	−8%	8.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.5 kn	−1%	−30%	−30%	+67%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Doornekamp Shipping Ltd.	3,500	11,221	38,473	2,808	13.7	91.0	57.3	–
2025	Atlantic Feeder IV AS	6,025	19,315	67,226	4,881	13.8	89.6	56.5	42%
2024	Doornekamp Shipping Ltd.	5,949	19,072	69,104	5,020	13.8	86.1	54.9	–
2023	not published	5,481	17,573	61,061	4,961	12.3	89.8	65.5	–
2022	not published	6,172	19,786	65,426	4,585	14.3	94.3	55.5	–
2021	not published	5,989	19,200	63,770	4,557	14.0	93.9	57.3	–
2020	not published	6,497	20,677	70,661	5,043	14.0	92.0	75.7	–
2019	not published	3,228	10,181	35,359	5,847	6.0	91.3	82.1	–
2018	not published	4,627	14,605	50,230	5,879	8.5	92.1	49.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Doornekamp Shipping Ltd.	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2025	Atlantic Feeder IV AS	56.5	16.3	+247%	2,089 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	Doornekamp Shipping Ltd.	54.9	17.5	+213%	1,820 of 1,974	RINA	–
2023	not published	65.5	19.4	+237%	1,817 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	55.5	19.1	+190%	1,674 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	57.3	17.9	+220%	1,656 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	75.7	17.6	+330%	1,766 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	82.1	18.9	+335%	1,750 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	49.2	20.2	+143%	1,471 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.