Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

FRANK

IMO: 9371787
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 8,101 t
Flag (estimated): Gibraltar
Port of registry: Gibraltar
Technical efficiency: EIV 13.92 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: SELANDIA SWAN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,172 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

85.6

Chemical tanker median 81.9 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

38.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+136%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,319 t

CO₂ emitted

7,434 t

Distance sailed

27,099 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,680 h

112 days, 31% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 81.1 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+2%)

52.8Ranks 772 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 11.1 (−9%)

8.8Faster than 25% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 31.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+112%)

7.93Ranks 1,202 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports45%
From the EU19%
Into the EU19%
At berth in the EU18%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,306 t

17.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FRANK
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FRANK
Chemical tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FRANK
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.8 kn	+4%	−4%	−14%	+6%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	−9%	−2%	+20%	−22%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	−8%	−15%	+34%	−9%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.6 kn	−3%	+28%	−18%	+5%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	−4%	−15%	−18%	+18%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.7 kn	−16%	+71%	+13%	−31%	4.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	+12%	+16%	−12%	+25%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG	2,275	7,238	28,052	2,787	10.1	81.1	31.9	–
2024	Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG	2,533	7,996	32,576	2,982	10.9	77.8	30.0	–
2023	not published	2,319	7,434	27,099	2,680	10.1	85.6	38.3	–
2022	not published	1,881	6,032	20,218	1,851	10.9	93.0	42.2	–
2021	not published	2,376	7,619	24,784	2,984	8.3	95.9	40.1	–
2020	not published	3,038	9,658	30,402	3,257	9.3	99.9	34.0	–
2019	not published	3,193	10,072	26,923	5,850	4.6	119	49.2	–
2018	not published	3,255	10,291	30,736	6,911	4.4	106	39.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG	31.9	15.0	+112%	1,202 of 1,460	Swiss Climate	A
2024	Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG	30.0	16.7	+79%	989 of 1,274	Swiss Climate	A
2023	not published	38.3	16.2	+136%	1,129 of 1,314	Swiss Climate	A
2022	not published	42.2	16.1	+163%	1,286 of 1,409	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	40.1	16.7	+140%	1,193 of 1,343	Bureau Veritas	B
2020	not published	34.0	16.2	+110%	1,099 of 1,312	Bureau Veritas	B
2019	not published	49.2	17.3	+184%	1,235 of 1,321	Bureau Veritas	B
2018	not published	39.4	17.1	+130%	1,115 of 1,294	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.