Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SINO FAITH

IMO: 9375575
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 18,971 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.81 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super
Former names: GOTLAND MARIEANN, NEW JUPITER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HENGAN STEAMSHIP CO.,LIMITED

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 18,971 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

90.5 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+14%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.18

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+1%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

725 t

CO₂ emitted

2,305 t

2,341 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

8,005 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

690 h

29 days, 8% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 90.5 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+14%)

52.8Ranks 1,000 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 11.1 (+5%)

8.8Faster than 66% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.18 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+1%)

7.93Ranks 740 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU47%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU3%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,183 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SINO FAITH
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Average speed, kn

SINO FAITH
Chemical tanker median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SINO FAITH
Chemical tanker median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2025	+1.6 kn	−13%	+1%	−78%	+43%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	+21%	+25%	+87%	+5%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	−24%	−28%	−46%	−28%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.7 kn	+24%	+6%	+97%	+26%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	−12%	−9%	−59%	−30%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	HENGAN STEAMSHIP CO.,LIMITED	725	2,305	8,005	690	11.6	90.5	15.18	–
2022	not published	3,749	11,798	35,950	3,603	10.0	104.3	10.64	–
2021	not published	1,656	5,206	19,233	1,984	9.7	86.1	10.11	–
2020	not published	4,020	12,687	35,518	3,452	10.3	113.2	14.04	–
2019	not published	1,653	5,168	18,053	1,510	12.0	91.6	11.17	–
2018	not published	4,535	14,293	43,712	3,770	11.6	103.7	16.03	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	HENGAN STEAMSHIP CO.,LIMITED	15.18	15.04	+1%	740 of 1,460	Korean Register	A
2022	not published	10.64	8.51	+25%	1,267 of 1,961	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	10.11	8.86	+14%	1,054 of 1,789	DNV	A
2020	not published	14.04	9.03	+55%	1,365 of 1,870	DNV	A
2019	not published	11.17	17.32	−36%	259 of 1,321	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	16.03	17.14	−6%	571 of 1,294	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.