Navalyze · Container · Ship

WILHELM

IMO: 9376050
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 6,214 t
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EIV 29.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "Wilhelm II" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,214 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

79.3 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−55%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

39.92

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+145%)

Average speed

12.1 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,891 t

CO₂ emitted

15,294 t

15,534 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

61,651 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,111 h

213 days, 58% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 79.3 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−55%)

78.8Ranks 234 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 13.3 (−9%)

9.1Faster than 31% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 39.92 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+145%)

7.22Ranks 1,877 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports76%
From the EU8%
Into the EU10%
At berth in the EU5%

68% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (10,449 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

WILHELM
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

WILHELM
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WILHELM
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	+6%	+7%	+6%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+0%	+3%	+12%	−18%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	−10%	−8%	−14%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+7%	+0%	−6%	+24%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	−6%	+2%	−0%	−11%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	−10%	+12%	+37%	−12%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.5 kn	+5%	+25%	+24%	−10%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MS "Wilhelm II" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG	4,891	15,294	61,651	5,111	12.1	79.3	39.92	–
2024	MS "Wilhelm II" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG	4,363	13,735	58,199	4,889	11.9	75.0	40.81	–
2023	not published	3,898	12,228	52,048	4,501	11.6	74.9	50.07	–
2022	not published	5,034	15,938	60,484	5,322	11.4	83.2	45.87	–
2021	not published	5,031	15,986	64,590	5,351	12.1	77.9	36.92	–
2020	not published	5,332	16,880	64,601	5,801	11.1	82.5	41.36	–
2019	not published	4,298	13,559	47,138	5,245	9.0	91.2	46.95	–
2018	not published	3,302	10,440	38,006	5,060	7.5	86.9	52.42	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS "Wilhelm II" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG	39.92	16.30	+145%	1,877 of 2,208	EnvService	B
2024	MS "Wilhelm II" Jens u. Waller GmbH & Co. KG	40.81	17.52	+133%	1,631 of 1,974	EnvService	B
2023	not published	50.07	19.40	+158%	1,683 of 1,899	EnvService	B
2022	not published	45.87	19.13	+140%	1,553 of 1,825	EnvService	B
2021	not published	36.92	17.90	+106%	1,439 of 1,781	EnvService	B
2020	not published	41.36	17.58	+135%	1,495 of 1,797	EnvService	B
2019	not published	46.95	18.88	+149%	1,502 of 1,788	EnvService	B
2018	not published	52.42	20.22	+159%	1,517 of 1,705	EnvService	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.