Navalyze · Other · Ship

TRINA

IMO: 9376505
Type: Other ship types
Flag (estimated): Germany (from the 2022 report)
Technical efficiency: EIV 25.77 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “TRINA” · part of SAL Heavy Lift

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

107

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (+94%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

35.2

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.5 (+44%)

Average speed

16.2 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (+51%)

Fuel per day at sea

41.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,455 t

CO₂ emitted

13,982 t

Distance sailed

41,715 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,571 h

107 days, 29% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2024

Set against all 189 other ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 104 kg/nm · median 72.5 (+43%)

42.2Ranks 146 of 189, lowest first142

Average speedThis ship 17.7 kn · median 11.1 (+59%)

8.5Faster than 98% of other ships14.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 139 g CO₂/t·nm · median 51.6 (+170%)

21.3Ranks 140 of 189, lowest first306

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU35%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

763 t

5.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TRINA
Other median

40.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TRINA
Other median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

TRINA
Other median

0.050.0100150200250

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	+5%	−1%	+43%	–	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.7 kn	−11%	−2%	−20%	−32%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	+9%	+1%	+98%	–	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.1 kn	−3%	+3%	+9%	–	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+4%	+4%	−53%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	+5%	+11%	+2%	−8%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	+1%	−2%	+9%	−16%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “TRINA”	5,288	16,514	48,646	2,916	16.7	109	–	–
2024	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “TRINA”	3,526	11,031	33,939	1,922	17.7	104	139	–
2023	not published	4,947	15,575	42,263	2,637	16.0	117	204	–
2022	not published	2,297	7,249	21,293	1,234	17.3	108	204	–
2021	not published	2,165	6,788	19,498	1,202	16.2	111	–	–
2020	not published	4,455	13,982	41,715	2,571	16.2	107	–	–
2019	not published	4,140	12,989	40,825	2,653	15.4	101	–	–
2018	not published	3,752	11,749	37,391	2,345	15.9	100	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Other median	vs Other	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “TRINA”	–	–	–	–	EnvService	A+C
2024	SAL Shipping UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “TRINA”	139	51.6	+170%	140 of 189	EnvService	C
2023	not published	204	93.5	+118%	89 of 116	Swiss Climate	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	34.1	22.7	+50%	942 of 1,142	Swiss Climate	A
2020	not published	35.2	24.5	+44%	913 of 1,167	Swiss Climate	A
2019	not published	38.4	25.0	+54%	911 of 1,154	Swiss Climate	A
2018	not published	45.9	24.9	+85%	883 of 1,044	Swiss Climate	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.