Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ECO 3

IMO: 9377066
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 3,661 t
Port of registry: Marseille
Technical efficiency: EIV 13.77 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: LACANAU

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: VALLOEBY LACANAU LIMITED · part of Valloeby

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,661 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

70.7 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 81.9 kg/nm (−14%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

61.91

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.23 (+281%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,766 t

CO₂ emitted

5,660 t

Distance sailed

24,968 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,479 h

103 days, 28% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,314 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 70.7 kg/nm · median 81.9 (−14%)

55.0Ranks 392 of 1,314, lowest first114.9

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 11.2 (−10%)

9.1Faster than 22% of chemical tanker ships12.7

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 61.91 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.23 (+281%)

9.07Ranks 1,272 of 1,314, lowest first43.80

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports29%
From the EU25%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU20%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

19.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ECO 3
Chemical tanker median

50.0100.0150.0200.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

ECO 3
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ECO 3
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’202020’212021’232023

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	−67%	−62%	+1,102%	–	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 67%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+2.4 kn	+189%	+292%	−91%	–	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 189%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	+2%	−8%	−24%	+49%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−2.5 kn	−30%	−48%	+60%	–	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−2.3 kn	+33%	+8%	−16%	–	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 33%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024part-year	VALLOEBY LACANAU LIMITED	331	1,061	2,535	368	6.9	130.6	107.48	–
2023	not published	1,766	5,660	24,968	2,479	10.1	70.7	61.91	–
2022	not published	440	1,407	2,077	232	9.0	211.6	216.37	–
2021	not published	1,748	5,539	23,898	3,627	6.6	73.1	78.33	–
2020	not published	2,241	7,104	31,310	4,265	7.3	71.6	52.42	71%
2019	not published	2,009	6,298	19,572	2,002	9.8	102.7	275.50	–
2018	not published	1,791	5,620	23,188	1,915	12.1	77.2	43.80	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	VALLOEBY LACANAU LIMITED	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2023	not published	61.91	16.23	+281%	1,272 of 1,314	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	78.33	16.69	+369%	1,331 of 1,343	Bureau Veritas	B
2020	not published	52.42	16.16	+224%	1,253 of 1,312	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2018	not published	43.80	17.14	+156%	1,161 of 1,294	Bureau Veritas	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.