Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

PORT PHILLIP

IMO: 9377975
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Hong Kong, China
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.80 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

82.8 kg/nm

General cargo median 57.3 kg/nm (+45%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

9.76

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 21.57 (−55%)

Average speed

11.0 kn

General cargo median 10.8 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,106 t

CO₂ emitted

9,794 t

Distance sailed

37,488 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,408 h

142 days, 39% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,034 general cargo ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 82.8 kg/nm · median 57.3 (+45%)

36.2Ranks 818 of 1,034, lowest first96.6

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 10.8 (+2%)

8.0Faster than 57% of general cargo ships12.9

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 9.76 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 21.57 (−55%)

9.00Ranks 125 of 1,034, lowest first43.69

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU43%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

90%

10% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

3.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

PORT PHILLIP
General cargo median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’192019’202020’222022

Average speed, kn

PORT PHILLIP
General cargo median

9.09.510.010.511.011.5

’192019’202020’222022

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PORT PHILLIP
General cargo median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’192019’202020’222022

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2020→2022	+1.3 kn	+8%	+22%	+102%	+13%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	+37%	+42%	+54%	+25%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 37%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2022	not published	3,106	9,794	37,488	3,408	11.0	82.8	–	90%
2020	not published	1,422	4,442	18,589	1,909	9.7	76.5	8.60	–
2019	not published	674	2,122	12,038	1,279	9.4	56.0	6.87	83%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2022	not published	9.76	21.57	−55%	125 of 1,034	ABS	A
2020	not published	8.60	8.24	+4%	1,701 of 3,150	ABS	A
2019	not published	6.87	8.38	−18%	1,052 of 3,360	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.