Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ARGENT ASTER

IMO
9379959
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
22,121 t
Port of registry
Panama
Technical efficiency
EEDI 13.00 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 22,121 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
93.5 kg/nm
Chemical tanker median 88.3 kg/nm (+6%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
13.21
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.32 (−24%)
Average speed
13.6 kn
Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (+35%)
Fuel per day at sea
30.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
980 t
CO₂ emitted
3,062 t
Distance sailed
10,479 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
771 h
32 days, 9% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,321 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 93.5 kg/nm · median 88.3 (+6%)
57.3Ranks 766 of 1,321, lowest first120.9
Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 10.1 (+35%)
6.3Faster than 96% of chemical tanker ships12.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.21 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.32 (−24%)
9.31Ranks 395 of 1,321, lowest first43.27
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU19%
  • Into the EU77%
  • At berth in the EU4%
Fuel burned laden
77%
23% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
4.3%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • ARGENT ASTER
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • ARGENT ASTER
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • ARGENT ASTER
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2018→2019+4.8 kn−9%+41%−19%−31%4.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2019not published9803,06210,47977113.693.513.2177%
2018not published1,3294,15312,9531,4808.8102.619.02–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2019not published13.2117.32−24%395 of 1,321ClassNKB
2018not published19.0217.14+11%752 of 1,294ClassNKB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

ARGENT ASTER (IMO 9379959): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2019 | Navalyze