Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

SEASPRAT

IMO: 9380477
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 18,067 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Bremen
Technical efficiency: EIV 8.05 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TMS "Seasprat" GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,772 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

107

Oil tanker median 138 kg/nm (−23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.83 (+127%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

Oil tanker median 9.7 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,842 t

CO₂ emitted

18,453 t

Distance sailed

54,849 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,942 h

206 days, 56% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 130 kg/nm · median 129 (+1%)

76.1Ranks 861 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.3 kn · median 10.7 (−4%)

8.0Faster than 39% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 22.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+187%)

4.51Ranks 1,442 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU36%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,432 t

7.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SEASPRAT
Oil tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SEASPRAT
Oil tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SEASPRAT
Oil tanker median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	−12%	−13%	+57%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	+15%	+24%	−29%	+15%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+1.5 kn	+31%	+54%	−29%	+46%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.0 kn	−0%	−27%	+7%	−20%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−2%	+0%	−22%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−7%	−6%	+9%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.7 kn	+9%	+44%	−2%	+7%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TMS "Seasprat" GmbH & Co. KG	5,072	16,075	39,059	3,775	10.3	130	22.8	–
2024	TMS "Seasprat" GmbH & Co. KG	3,682	11,655	24,905	2,380	10.5	148	25.2	–
2023	not published	4,488	14,241	35,023	3,587	9.8	128	21.9	–
2022	not published	4,854	15,375	49,621	5,987	8.3	97.8	15.0	–
2021	not published	4,560	14,441	46,560	4,106	11.3	97.9	18.8	52%
2020	not published	5,918	18,685	59,550	5,316	11.2	99.4	17.8	–
2019	not published	5,842	18,453	54,849	4,942	11.1	107	20.1	–
2018	not published	5,449	17,187	55,738	6,622	8.4	97.8	18.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TMS "Seasprat" GmbH & Co. KG	22.8	7.95	+187%	1,442 of 1,665	Verifavia	A
2024	TMS "Seasprat" GmbH & Co. KG	25.2	8.06	+213%	1,601 of 1,787	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	21.9	8.44	+159%	1,576 of 1,797	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	15.0	8.51	+76%	1,549 of 1,961	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	18.8	8.86	+112%	1,497 of 1,789	ABS	A
2020	not published	17.8	9.03	+97%	1,532 of 1,870	ABS	A
2019	not published	20.1	8.83	+127%	1,639 of 1,919	ABS	A
2018	not published	18.7	8.86	+111%	1,509 of 1,779	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.