Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

GULF BAYNUNAH

IMO
9381562
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
26,244 t
Port of registry
Nassau
Technical efficiency
EIV 6.03 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Gulf Energy Maritime GEM PJSC

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 26,244 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
106.9 kg/nm
Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+34%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
12.75
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (−15%)
Average speed
11.7 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+5%)
Fuel per day at sea
30.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,234 t
CO₂ emitted
3,860 t
3,920 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
11,536 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
987 h
41 days, 11% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 106.9 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+34%)
52.8Ranks 1,273 of 1,460, lowest first111.0
Average speedThis ship 11.7 kn · median 11.1 (+5%)
8.8Faster than 70% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.75 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (−15%)
7.93Ranks 565 of 1,460, lowest first40.17
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU81%
  • Into the EU17%
  • At berth in the EU2%

45% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,755 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1.9%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • GULF BAYNUNAH
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • GULF BAYNUNAH
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • GULF BAYNUNAH
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2021→2025−0.2 kn+24%+21%−72%+16%Same speed, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+1.6 kn−8%+6%+276%+10%1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−0.6 kn−8%−12%−54%−17%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019–––––

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025part-yearGulf Energy Maritime GEM PJSC1334232,07917212.164.2––
2025Gulf Energy Maritime (GEM) Shipping FZCO1,2343,86011,53698711.7106.912.75–
2021not published3,53711,07440,9033,44011.986.510.97–
2020not published1,0243,20710,8761,05310.394.29.98–
2019not published2,4197,57823,5832,17310.9102.612.09–
2018not published00–0––––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearGulf Energy Maritime GEM PJSC––––VerifaviaB+C
2025Gulf Energy Maritime (GEM) Shipping FZCO12.7515.04−15%565 of 1,460VerifaviaB+C
2021not published10.9716.69−34%252 of 1,343VerifaviaC
2020not published9.9816.16−38%177 of 1,312VerifaviaC
2019not published12.0917.32−30%314 of 1,321VerifaviaC
2018not published––––VerifaviaC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

GULF BAYNUNAH (IMO 9381562): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze