Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

EASTERLY CANYON

IMO: 9383974
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 15,880 t
Port of registry: Marshall Islands
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.76 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ATLANTIC CANYON

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NORSTAR SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,880 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

94.2 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+18%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

18.78

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+25%)

Average speed

11.5 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,985 t

CO₂ emitted

9,451 t

9,597 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

31,690 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,746 h

114 days, 31% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 94.2 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+18%)

52.8Ranks 1,075 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 11.1 (+4%)

8.8Faster than 64% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.78 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+25%)

7.93Ranks 901 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports43%
From the EU19%
Into the EU20%
At berth in the EU17%

66% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,215 t).

Fuel burned laden

48%

52% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

17.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

EASTERLY CANYON
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EASTERLY CANYON
Chemical tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EASTERLY CANYON
Chemical tanker median

12.515.017.520.022.525.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−11%	−14%	+19%	+11%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.5 kn	−10%	+4%	−7%	−27%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.2 kn	+26%	+42%	−2%	+11%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 26%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.6 kn	+13%	−3%	−10%	+37%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	+0.6 kn	−20%	−16%	+245%	+16%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+4.5 kn	+5%	+90%	−61%	−43%	4.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	NORSTAR SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	2,985	9,451	31,690	2,746	11.5	94.2	18.78	48%
2024	NORSTAR SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	2,814	8,918	26,720	2,240	11.9	105.3	16.88	–
2023	not published	3,361	10,665	28,756	2,770	10.4	116.9	23.10	44%
2022	not published	2,714	8,536	29,211	3,174	9.2	92.9	20.79	41%
2021	not published	2,661	8,433	32,400	3,010	10.8	82.1	15.22	–
2019	not published	960	2,995	9,385	918	10.2	102.2	13.13	–
2018	not published	2,334	13,285	24,083	4,242	5.7	96.9	22.95	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NORSTAR SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	18.78	15.04	+25%	901 of 1,460	ABS	A
2024	NORSTAR SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	16.88	16.73	+1%	648 of 1,274	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	23.10	16.23	+42%	888 of 1,314	ABS	–
2022	not published	20.79	16.06	+29%	920 of 1,409	ABS	–
2021	not published	15.22	16.69	−9%	577 of 1,343	Korean Register	A
2019	not published	13.13	17.32	−24%	390 of 1,321	Korean Register	A
2018	not published	22.95	17.14	+34%	894 of 1,294	Korean Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.