Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

VALCADORE

IMO: 9384112
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 16,920 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Navigazione Montanari SpA

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,920 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

110.9 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (−14%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.92

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+163%)

Average speed

6.5 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−39%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,247 t

CO₂ emitted

13,557 t

13,766 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

38,301 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,884 h

245 days, 67% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 110.9 kg/nm · median 128.5 (−14%)

76.1Ranks 533 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 6.5 kn · median 10.7 (−39%)

8.0Faster than 3% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.92 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+163%)

4.51Ranks 1,415 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports45%
From the EU20%
Into the EU18%
At berth in the EU17%

81% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (10,966 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

16.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

VALCADORE
Oil tanker median

100.0110.0120.0130.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VALCADORE
Oil tanker median

2.55.07.510.012.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VALCADORE
Oil tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−5.0 kn	−8%	−48%	+16%	−10%	5.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+3.5 kn	−12%	+26%	+38%	+14%	3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.5 kn	+29%	+9%	−36%	+8%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	+3%	−10%	−14%	+1%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+7.4 kn	−21%	+147%	+53%	−45%	7.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.1 kn	+12%	−16%	−23%	+6,790%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−7.3 kn	+2%	−60%	+10%	+19%	7.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Navigazione Montanari SpA	4,247	13,557	38,301	5,884	6.5	110.9	20.92	–
2024	Navigazione Montanari SpA	3,971	12,573	33,018	2,876	11.5	120.3	23.27	–
2023	not published	3,262	10,313	23,933	2,989	8.0	136.3	20.38	–
2022	not published	3,923	12,418	37,179	3,920	9.5	105.5	18.93	–
2021	not published	4,398	13,914	43,010	3,951	10.9	102.2	18.80	–
2020	not published	3,631	11,482	28,077	8,075	3.5	129.3	34.45	–
2019	not published	4,225	13,260	36,486	7,935	4.6	115.8	0.50	–
2018	not published	3,755	11,770	33,157	2,797	11.9	113.2	0.42	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Navigazione Montanari SpA	20.92	7.95	+163%	1,415 of 1,665	RINA	B
2024	Navigazione Montanari SpA	23.27	8.06	+189%	1,573 of 1,787	RINA	B
2023	not published	20.38	8.44	+141%	1,544 of 1,797	RINA	B
2022	not published	18.93	8.51	+122%	1,671 of 1,961	RINA	–
2021	not published	18.80	8.86	+112%	1,499 of 1,789	RINA	–
2020	not published	34.45	9.03	+282%	1,762 of 1,870	RINA	–
2019	not published	0.50	8.83	−94%	13 of 1,919	RINA	–
2018	not published	0.42	8.86	−95%	11 of 1,779	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.