Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

VALTELLINA

IMO
9384136
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
16,590 t
Port of registry
Valletta
Technical efficiency
EIV 6.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Navigazione Montanari SpA

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,590 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
105.5 kg/nm
Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (−18%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
20.29
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+155%)
Average speed
9.1 kn
Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−15%)
Fuel per day at sea
22.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
3,927 t
CO₂ emitted
12,536 t
12,729 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
37,242 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,110 h
171 days, 47% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 105.5 kg/nm · median 128.5 (−18%)
76.1Ranks 465 of 1,665, lowest first190.8
Average speedThis ship 9.1 kn · median 10.7 (−15%)
8.0Faster than 18% of oil tanker ships12.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.29 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+155%)
4.51Ranks 1,400 of 1,665, lowest first27.66
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports53%
  • From the EU18%
  • Into the EU14%
  • At berth in the EU16%

82% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (10,302 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
15.9%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.2 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • VALTELLINA
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • VALTELLINA
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • VALTELLINA
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−0.9 kn−5%−14%+15%+11%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−1.1 kn+17%+6%−8%−15%1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+5.3 kn−11%+72%+3%+5%5.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−7.0 kn+7%−51%−18%−15%7.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+6.3 kn−6%+84%+20%+4%6.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+0.0 kn−1%−1%−4%+6,936%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019−0.6 kn+16%+6%−16%−8%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Navigazione Montanari SpA3,92712,53637,2424,1109.1105.520.29–
2024Navigazione Montanari SpA3,59811,39732,4003,23410.0111.018.20–
2023not published3,34110,57035,2043,16311.194.921.44–
2022not published3,63411,38734,2615,9445.8106.120.50–
2021not published4,13213,05641,6883,26912.899.124.12–
2020not published3,64411,51734,6835,2986.5105.123.22–
2019not published3,83212,02536,0275,5246.5106.40.33–
2018not published3,92512,31942,6926,0197.191.90.36–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025Navigazione Montanari SpA20.297.95+155%1,400 of 1,665RINAB
2024Navigazione Montanari SpA18.208.06+126%1,496 of 1,787RINAB
2023not published21.448.44+154%1,567 of 1,797RINAB
2022not published20.508.51+141%1,704 of 1,961RINA–
2021not published24.128.86+172%1,589 of 1,789RINA–
2020not published23.229.03+157%1,642 of 1,870RINA–
2019not published0.338.83−96%4 of 1,919RINA–
2018not published0.368.86−96%4 of 1,779RINAB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.