Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship
POOLE
- IMO
- 9385221
- Type
- Bulk carrier
- Average cargo carried
- 0 t
- Port of registry
- Majuro
- Technical efficiency
- EEXI 8.92 g CO₂/t·nm
- Former names
- ANNELISA, SODA
ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Ciner Ship Management Ltd
2025 at a glance
From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.
Within the general cargo fleet, 2024
Set against all 1,111 general cargo ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.
Where the emissions happen, 2025
THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.
- Between EU ports8%
- From the EU44%
- Into the EU45%
- At berth in the EU3%
17% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (697 t).
Over the years
Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.
Fuel per mile, kg/nm
- POOLE
- Bulk carrier median
Average speed, kn
- POOLE
- Bulk carrier median
CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm
- POOLE
- Bulk carrier median
Year on year
| Year | Speed | Fuel per mile | Fuel per day | Distance | CO₂ per TW | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024→2025 | −4.2 kn | +8% | −35% | +9% | – | 4.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2023→2024 | −0.6 kn | −21% | −25% | −39% | −17% | 0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2022→2023 | +0.4 kn | −12% | −9% | +3% | −14% | 0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2021→2022 | +0.1 kn | −7% | −7% | −19% | −23% | Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2020→2021 | +0.2 kn | +10% | +13% | +9% | +38% | Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2019→2020 | +2.6 kn | −7% | +22% | +562% | +17% | 2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2018→2019 | −2.2 kn | −15% | −33% | −74% | −10% | 2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.
Every reporting year
One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.
Operation
| Year | ISM company | Fuel t | CO₂ t | Distance nm | At sea h | Speed kn | Fuel kg/nm | CO₂ g/t·nm | Laden fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Ciner Ship Management Ltd | 1,324 | 4,200 | 30,724 | 4,676 | 6.6 | 43.1 | 600,031.04 | – |
| 2024 | DEVAL MARINE GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S. | 1,127 | 3,531 | 28,150 | 2,604 | 10.8 | 40.0 | – | 57% |
| 2023 | not published | 2,310 | 7,240 | 45,834 | 4,012 | 11.4 | 50.4 | – | 59% |
| 2022 | not published | 2,551 | 8,015 | 44,384 | 4,052 | 11.0 | 57.5 | 17.97 | – |
| 2021 | not published | 3,395 | 10,670 | 55,044 | 5,044 | 10.9 | 61.7 | 23.42 | – |
| 2020 | not published | 2,842 | 8,937 | 50,697 | 4,734 | 10.7 | 56.1 | 17.01 | – |
| 2019 | not published | 464 | 1,458 | 7,655 | 946 | 8.1 | 60.6 | 14.51 | – |
| 2018 | not published | 2,061 | 6,453 | 28,907 | 2,812 | 10.3 | 71.3 | 16.18 | – |
Benchmark and verification
| Year | ISM company | CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm | Bulk carrier median | vs Bulk carrier | Rank | Verifier | Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Ciner Ship Management Ltd | – | – | – | – | Lloyd's Register | A |
| 2024 | DEVAL MARINE GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S. | 12.84 | 19.25 | −33% | 336 of 1,111 | Polish Register of Shipping | B |
| 2023 | not published | 15.40 | 20.67 | −25% | 329 of 1,045 | Polish Register of Shipping | B |
| 2022 | not published | 17.97 | 8.71 | +106% | 3,627 of 3,968 | Verifavia | B |
| 2021 | not published | 23.42 | 8.57 | +173% | 3,365 of 3,466 | Verifavia | B |
| 2020 | not published | 17.01 | 8.24 | +106% | 2,936 of 3,150 | Lloyd's Register | B |
| 2019 | not published | 14.51 | 8.38 | +73% | 2,957 of 3,360 | Lloyd's Register | B |
| 2018 | not published | 16.18 | 8.50 | +90% | 3,052 of 3,384 | EMICERT | A |
Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.