Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

POOLE

IMO: 9385221
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 0 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.92 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ANNELISA, SODA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Ciner Ship Management Ltd

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,797 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

71.3

Bulk carrier median 92.4 kg/nm (−23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.50 (+90%)

Average speed

10.3 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.4 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,061 t

CO₂ emitted

6,453 t

Distance sailed

28,907 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,812 h

117 days, 32% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,111 general cargo ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 40.0 kg/nm · median 58.7 (−32%)

34.9Ranks 221 of 1,111, lowest first87.0

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 10.5 (+3%)

7.8Faster than 57% of general cargo ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 12.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 19.3 (−33%)

7.51Ranks 336 of 1,111, lowest first39.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU61%
Into the EU30%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

240 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

POOLE
Bulk carrier median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

POOLE
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

POOLE
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−4.2 kn	+8%	−35%	+9%	–	4.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	−21%	−25%	−39%	−17%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	−12%	−9%	+3%	−14%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	−7%	−7%	−19%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+10%	+13%	+9%	+38%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.6 kn	−7%	+22%	+562%	+17%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.2 kn	−15%	−33%	−74%	−10%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Ciner Ship Management Ltd	1,324	4,200	30,724	4,676	6.6	43.1	600,031	–
2024	DEVAL MARINE GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.	1,127	3,531	28,150	2,604	10.8	40.0	–	57%
2023	not published	2,310	7,240	45,834	4,012	11.4	50.4	–	59%
2022	not published	2,551	8,015	44,384	4,052	11.0	57.5	18.0	–
2021	not published	3,395	10,670	55,044	5,044	10.9	61.7	23.4	–
2020	not published	2,842	8,937	50,697	4,734	10.7	56.1	17.0	–
2019	not published	464	1,458	7,655	946	8.1	60.6	14.5	–
2018	not published	2,061	6,453	28,907	2,812	10.3	71.3	16.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Ciner Ship Management Ltd	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	DEVAL MARINE GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.	12.8	19.3	−33%	336 of 1,111	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2023	not published	15.4	20.7	−25%	329 of 1,045	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2022	not published	18.0	8.71	+106%	3,627 of 3,968	Verifavia	B
2021	not published	23.4	8.57	+173%	3,365 of 3,466	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	17.0	8.24	+106%	2,936 of 3,150	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	14.5	8.38	+73%	2,957 of 3,360	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	16.2	8.50	+90%	3,052 of 3,384	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.