Navalyze · Container · Ship

A LA MARINE

IMO: 9386524
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 10,401 t
Flag (estimated): Belgium
Port of registry: Antwerpen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 19.03 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: A La Marine B.V.

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,875 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

87.0

Container median 165 kg/nm (−47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

27.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (+44%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,638 t

CO₂ emitted

11,510 t

Distance sailed

41,789 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,936 h

164 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 81.0 kg/nm · median 177 (−54%)

78.8Ranks 256 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.5 kn · median 13.3 (−21%)

9.1Faster than 18% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+50%)

7.22Ranks 1,541 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports47%
From the EU22%
Into the EU27%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

475 t

4.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

A LA MARINE
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

A LA MARINE
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

A LA MARINE
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	−12%	−4%	−7%	−24%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	+6%	−4%	+8%	+16%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	−4%	−14%	−18%	+0%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.9 kn	+25%	+35%	−14%	+35%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	−9%	−11%	−1%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	−4%	−6%	−5%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+2.3 kn	+19%	+49%	+40%	+18%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	A La Marine B.V.	3,395	10,680	41,925	3,978	10.5	81.0	24.5	100%
2024	A La Marine B.V.	4,155	13,114	44,991	4,667	9.6	92.3	32.4	–
2023	not published	3,638	11,510	41,789	3,936	10.6	87.0	27.9	–
2022	not published	4,635	14,602	51,063	4,315	11.8	90.8	27.8	–
2021	not published	4,301	13,553	59,067	5,394	10.9	72.8	20.7	–
2020	not published	4,805	15,168	59,939	5,365	11.2	80.2	23.0	–
2019	not published	5,238	16,480	62,902	5,518	11.4	83.3	22.8	–
2018	not published	3,156	9,943	45,028	4,958	9.1	70.1	19.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	A La Marine B.V.	24.5	16.3	+50%	1,541 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	A La Marine B.V.	32.4	17.5	+85%	1,500 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	27.9	19.4	+44%	1,291 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	27.8	19.1	+45%	1,239 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	20.7	17.9	+15%	1,029 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	23.0	17.6	+31%	1,148 of 1,797	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	22.8	18.9	+21%	1,064 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	19.4	20.2	−4%	805 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.