Navalyze · Container · Ship

MARBURG

IMO: 9387592
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 7,027 t
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: St.John'S
Technical efficiency: EEXI 19.94 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: PEGASUS, ELBSTAR

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Jorg Kopping Dritte Bereedereungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. MS. "Marburg" KG

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,529 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

92.4

Container median 182 kg/nm (−49%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

38.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+91%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−12%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,885 t

CO₂ emitted

18,555 t

Distance sailed

63,694 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,233 h

218 days, 60% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 94.0 kg/nm · median 177 (−47%)

78.8Ranks 459 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.8 kn · median 13.3 (−26%)

9.1Faster than 14% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 41.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+156%)

7.22Ranks 1,908 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports68%
From the EU11%
Into the EU9%
At berth in the EU11%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,100 t

11.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MARBURG
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MARBURG
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MARBURG
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.9 kn	+15%	−3%	−18%	+4%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	−3%	−11%	−3%	−1%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−4%	+3%	+5%	+18%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	+2%	+6%	−4%	−1%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−1%	−0%	+7%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	−3%	−8%	−8%	+0%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−3%	−4%	−10%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Jorg Kopping Dritte Bereedereungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. MS. "Marburg" KG	4,272	13,342	45,457	4,623	9.8	94.0	41.8	–
2024part-year	MS ELBSTAR GmbH & Co KG	4,114	12,812	50,596	4,289	11.8	81.3	40.7	–
2024Bio blend	Jorg Kopping Dritte Bereedereungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. MS. "Marburg" KG	4,504	13,837	55,327	4,724	11.7	81.4	40.3	–
2023	not published	4,808	15,203	57,044	4,503	12.7	84.3	40.6	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	4,738	12,635	54,220	4,568	11.9	87.4	34.3	–
2021	not published	4,859	15,310	56,760	4,946	11.5	85.6	34.8	–
2020	not published	4,592	14,552	52,841	4,648	11.4	86.9	36.3	–
2019	not published	5,170	16,280	57,532	4,809	12.0	89.8	36.3	–
2018	not published	5,885	18,555	63,694	5,233	12.2	92.4	38.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Jorg Kopping Dritte Bereedereungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. MS. "Marburg" KG	41.8	16.3	+156%	1,908 of 2,208	EnvService	B
2024part-year	MS ELBSTAR GmbH & Co KG	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2024Bio blend	Jorg Kopping Dritte Bereedereungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. MS. "Marburg" KG	40.3	17.5	+130%	1,625 of 1,974	EnvService	A
2023	not published	40.6	19.4	+109%	1,546 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022LNG / alt.	not published	34.3	19.1	+79%	1,385 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	34.8	17.9	+94%	1,405 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	36.3	17.6	+107%	1,427 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	36.3	18.9	+92%	1,362 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	38.7	20.2	+91%	1,321 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.