Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

RCC ASIA

IMO: 9391581
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 4,582 t
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.16 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: STAMCO SHIP MANAGEMENT CO LTD

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,582 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

105.3 kg/nm

Vehicle carrier median 99.9 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

72.08

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.36 (+30%)

Average speed

15.6 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (+8%)

Fuel per day at sea

39.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,680 t

CO₂ emitted

14,673 t

14,903 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

44,428 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,848 h

119 days, 33% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 105.3 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+5%)

79.6Ranks 334 of 506, lowest first119.0

Average speedThis ship 15.6 kn · median 14.4 (+8%)

12.0Faster than 83% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 72.08 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.36 (+30%)

34.70Ranks 335 of 506, lowest first158.48

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU65%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU2%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,804 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

RCC ASIA
Vehicle carrier median

50.0100.0150.0200.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

RCC ASIA
Vehicle carrier median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

RCC ASIA
Vehicle carrier median

40.060.080.0100120140

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.5 kn	+1%	−8%	+2,573%	+18%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.9 kn	−6%	+13%	−91%	+15%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2023	+1.5 kn	−20%	−11%	+32%	−42%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.7 kn	+21%	+7%	−31%	+74%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	−7%	−11%	+118%	−21%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	−46%	−43%	−66%	−46%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 46%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	STAMCO SHIP MANAGEMENT CO LTD	4,680	14,673	44,428	2,848	15.6	105.3	72.08	–
2024	STAMCO SHIP MANAGEMENT CO LTD	173	545	1,662	97	17.1	104.3	61.33	–
2023	not published	2,027	6,347	18,276	1,290	14.2	110.9	53.11	–
2021	not published	1,930	6,120	13,843	1,093	12.7	139.4	91.07	–
2020	not published	2,314	7,331	20,092	1,399	14.4	115.2	52.22	–
2019	not published	1,142	3,580	9,218	612	15.1	123.9	66.13	–
2018	not published	6,237	19,520	27,383	1,912	14.3	227.8	122.04	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	STAMCO SHIP MANAGEMENT CO LTD	72.08	55.36	+30%	335 of 506	DNV	A
2024	STAMCO SHIP MANAGEMENT CO LTD	61.33	55.31	+11%	195 of 335	DNV	A
2023	not published	53.11	56.64	−6%	178 of 417	DNV	A
2021	not published	91.07	59.57	+53%	376 of 459	DNV	A
2020	not published	52.22	57.26	−9%	177 of 449	DNV	A
2019	not published	66.13	58.95	+12%	271 of 426	DNV	A
2018	not published	122.04	62.35	+96%	375 of 434	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.