Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

LAGAVULIN

IMO
9396555
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
10,062 t
Flag (estimated)
Liberia
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 7.92 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
HATICE C

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Webulk Denizcilik Isletmeleri A.S

?
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,138 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
47.7
Bulk carrier median 86.5 kg/nm (−45%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
21.1
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.24 (+156%)
Average speed
9.8 kn
Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (−12%)
Fuel per day at sea
11.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,238 t
CO₂ emitted
3,913 t
Distance sailed
25,984 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,641 h
110 days, 30% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 38.6 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−53%)
61.0Ranks 25 of 3,611, lowest first114
Average speedThis ship 8.9 kn · median 10.7 (−17%)
8.8Faster than 11% of bulk carrier ships11.8
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+54%)
4.80Ranks 2,961 of 3,611, lowest first15.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports13%
  • From the EU35%
  • Into the EU49%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
685 t
55% of all fuel; 45% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
126 t
3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • LAGAVULIN
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • LAGAVULIN
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • LAGAVULIN
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.9 kn+10%−1%−50%+51%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−0.2 kn−24%−25%+156%−39%Same speed, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−11.1 kn+85%−13%−75%+108%11.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 85%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+10.5 kn−47%+7%+21%−57%10.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 47%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+0.8 kn−2%+4%+43%−30%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+2.1 kn−6%+20%−9%+30%2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+5.2 kn+2%+213%+50%−39%5.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Webulk Denizcilik Isletmeleri A.S5471,73814,1811,5978.938.612.2–
2024Webulk Denizcilik Isletmeleri A.S9973,14028,3722,8949.835.18.0788%
2023not published5091,60011,0971,11410.045.913.278%
2022not published1,1213,54745,2232,14021.124.86.3891%
2021not published1,7415,51637,2843,53410.646.714.877%
2020not published1,2383,91325,9842,6419.847.721.155%
2019not published1,4514,54428,5893,7187.750.816.376%
2018not published9512,98519,0997,7362.549.826.770%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025Webulk Denizcilik Isletmeleri A.S12.27.90+54%2,961 of 3,611Polish Register of ShippingB
2024Webulk Denizcilik Isletmeleri A.S8.078.09−0%1,538 of 3,089Polish Register of ShippingB
2023not published13.28.27+60%2,934 of 3,548Polish Register of ShippingB
2022not published6.388.71−27%865 of 3,968RINAA
2021not published14.88.57+73%3,085 of 3,466RINAA
2020not published21.18.24+156%3,043 of 3,150RINAA
2019not published16.38.38+94%3,081 of 3,360RINA–
2018not published26.78.50+214%3,276 of 3,384Lloyd's RegisterA+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.