Navalyze · Container · Ship

ERASMUS HOPE

IMO: 9396634
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 6,617 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 19.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SATURN, EVI

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: EMSTRANS SCHEEPVAART MGMT

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,868 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

103

Container median 186 kg/nm (−45%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

65.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (+267%)

Average speed

10.2 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (−28%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

494 t

CO₂ emitted

1,542 t

Distance sailed

4,821 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

475 h

20 days, 5% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 122 kg/nm · median 177 (−31%)

78.8Ranks 720 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 8.1 kn · median 13.3 (−39%)

9.1Faster than 6% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 58.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+261%)

7.22Ranks 2,104 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU70%
Into the EU27%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

49 t

3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ERASMUS HOPE
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ERASMUS HOPE
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ERASMUS HOPE
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.1 kn	+6%	−23%	−48%	−31%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	+27%	+37%	−3%	+42%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.0 kn	−28%	−21%	+354%	−13%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	+23%	+14%	+22%	+5%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−2.9 kn	+16%	−10%	+162%	+190%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	EMSTRANS SCHEEPVAART MGMT	559	1,752	4,624	728	6.4	121	56.0	–
2025	AMANN SHIP MANAGEMENT LIMITED	1,656	5,265	13,540	1,667	8.1	122	58.8	–
2024	EMSTRANS SCHEEPVAART MGMT	2,995	9,421	25,923	2,317	11.2	116	85.3	–
2023	not published	2,429	7,593	26,650	2,572	10.4	91.1	60.2	–
2022	not published	743	2,316	5,874	623	9.4	127	69.3	–
2021	not published	494	1,542	4,821	475	10.2	103	65.7	–
2020	not published	164	509	1,843	140	13.1	88.7	22.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	EMSTRANS SCHEEPVAART MGMT	–	–	–	–	Swiss Climate	B
2025	AMANN SHIP MANAGEMENT LIMITED	58.8	16.3	+261%	2,104 of 2,208	China Classification Society	A
2024	EMSTRANS SCHEEPVAART MGMT	85.3	17.5	+387%	1,944 of 1,974	Swiss Climate	B
2023	not published	60.2	19.4	+210%	1,781 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	69.3	19.1	+262%	1,765 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	65.7	17.9	+267%	1,713 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	22.6	17.6	+29%	1,129 of 1,797	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.