Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ORIONIS

IMO: 9400370
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 17,422 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.78 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CHEMBULK JAKARTA, ORION

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GLOBAL PACIFIC SHIPPING JOINT STOCK COMPANY

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 14,761 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

83.9

Chemical tanker median 81.9 kg/nm (+2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+10%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,147 t

CO₂ emitted

3,608 t

Distance sailed

13,664 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,317 h

55 days, 15% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 64.6 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−19%)

52.8Ranks 369 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 11.1 (+2%)

8.8Faster than 57% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−23%)

7.93Ranks 470 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports26%
From the EU31%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

297 t

8.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ORIONIS
Chemical tanker median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ORIONIS
Chemical tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ORIONIS
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	+3%	−3%	−58%	−43%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.6 kn	−25%	−14%	+79%	+14%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2023	−0.9 kn	+1%	−7%	+35%	−58%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+6.2 kn	+9%	+141%	+33%	+149%	6.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−7.0 kn	−11%	−62%	−22%	−15%	7.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	GLOBAL PACIFIC SHIPPING JOINT STOCK COMPANY	659	2,071	10,204	902	11.3	64.6	11.7	–
2024	GLOBAL PACIFIC SHIPPING JOINT STOCK COMPANY	1,534	4,819	24,458	2,046	12.0	62.7	20.4	–
2023	not published	1,147	3,608	13,664	1,317	10.4	83.9	17.9	–
2020	not published	841	2,644	10,144	901	11.3	82.9	42.4	49%
2019	not published	580	1,836	7,641	1,503	5.1	75.9	17.0	100%
2018	not published	833	2,615	9,788	811	12.1	85.1	20.1	86%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	GLOBAL PACIFIC SHIPPING JOINT STOCK COMPANY	11.7	15.0	−23%	470 of 1,460	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	GLOBAL PACIFIC SHIPPING JOINT STOCK COMPANY	20.4	16.7	+22%	789 of 1,274	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	17.9	16.2	+10%	724 of 1,314	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	42.4	16.2	+162%	1,193 of 1,312	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2019	not published	17.0	17.3	−2%	641 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	A+C
2018	not published	20.1	17.1	+18%	804 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.