Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

JBU OPAL

IMO
9400409
Type
Chemical tanker
Port of registry
Jeju
Technical efficiency
EEXI 7.81 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Taikun Shipping Co Ltd

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
–
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
–
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
–
Fuel per day at sea
–
Fuel consumed
0 t
CO₂ emitted
0 t
0 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
–
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
0 h
0 days, 0% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,274 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 111.9 kg/nm · median 80.8 (+38%)
53.8Ranks 1,156 of 1,274, lowest first110.8
Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 11.0 (−4%)
8.7Faster than 39% of chemical tanker ships12.5
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.08 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.73 (+20%)
8.47Ranks 775 of 1,274, lowest first41.97
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

The voyage split is not in this year's report.

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
–
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • JBU OPAL
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • JBU OPAL
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • JBU OPAL
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025–––––
2021→2024−0.7 kn+27%+19%−39%−15%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Taikun Shipping Co Ltd00–0––––
2024Taikun Shipping Co Ltd5771,8285,15448810.6111.920.08–
2021not published7432,3558,42074711.388.323.54–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025Taikun Shipping Co Ltd––––Korean RegisterA
2024Taikun Shipping Co Ltd20.0816.73+20%775 of 1,274Korean RegisterA
2021not published23.5416.69+41%943 of 1,343ClassNKA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

JBU OPAL (IMO 9400409): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2021–2025 | Navalyze