Navalyze · Container · Ship

LUCIA B

IMO: 9404077
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 3,846 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EIV 34.25 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: KARIN SCHEPERS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HS Service GmbH & Co KG · part of HS Schiffahrt

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,499 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

83.4

Container median 174 kg/nm (−52%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

74.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+294%)

Average speed

15.2 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,579 t

CO₂ emitted

23,619 t

Distance sailed

90,838 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,985 h

249 days, 68% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 65.3 kg/nm · median 177 (−63%)

78.8Ranks 68 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 13.3 (+0%)

9.1Faster than 50% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 53.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+225%)

7.22Ranks 2,060 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports98%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

465 t

2.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LUCIA B
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LUCIA B
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LUCIA B
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−2%	−5%	−2%	−6%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+7%	+11%	−14%	−19%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−13%	−17%	+5%	+0%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	−7%	−8%	−4%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+3.1 kn	−1%	+27%	+62%	+12%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−4.2 kn	−7%	−33%	−42%	−5%	4.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	HS Service GmbH & Co KG	4,741	14,784	72,572	5,441	13.3	65.3	53.0	–
2024	HS Service GmbH & Co KG	4,942	15,460	74,420	5,414	13.7	66.4	56.1	–
2023	not published	5,385	16,781	86,559	6,525	13.3	62.2	69.0	–
2022	not published	5,851	18,240	82,233	5,863	14.0	71.2	68.8	–
2021	not published	6,621	20,640	86,072	6,094	14.1	76.9	78.5	–
2020	not published	4,109	12,820	53,126	4,813	11.0	77.3	70.3	–
2019	not published	7,579	23,619	90,838	5,985	15.2	83.4	74.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	HS Service GmbH & Co KG	53.0	16.3	+225%	2,060 of 2,208	Swiss Climate	B
2024	HS Service GmbH & Co KG	56.1	17.5	+220%	1,828 of 1,974	Swiss Climate	B
2023	not published	69.0	19.4	+256%	1,833 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	68.8	19.1	+259%	1,759 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	78.5	17.9	+339%	1,753 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	70.3	17.6	+300%	1,748 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	74.3	18.9	+294%	1,729 of 1,788	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.