Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

CAPTAIN RAVI

IMO: 9404429
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 22,693 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EIV 8.32 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC
Former names: RODINA, CLIPPER HONG KONG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MPP CARRIERS S.A.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 22,693 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

83.7 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.62

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+47%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+8%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

783 t

CO₂ emitted

2,464 t

2,503 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

9,346 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

806 h

34 days, 9% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 83.7 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+1%)

61.0Ranks 1,881 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 10.7 (+8%)

8.8Faster than 86% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.62 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+47%)

4.80Ranks 2,892 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU16%
Into the EU71%
At berth in the EU13%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,397 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

13.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CAPTAIN RAVI
Bulk carrier median

70.075.080.085.090.095.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CAPTAIN RAVI
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CAPTAIN RAVI
Bulk carrier median

0.05.010.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.1 kn	−1%	+10%	−55%	−8%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.9 kn	+3%	−13%	+70%	+42%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+9%	+9%	−42%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−7%	−4%	−7%	−4%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.8 kn	+8%	+27%	+73%	+25%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−19%	−17%	+4%	+396%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.6 kn	+6%	+26%	−63%	+40%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MPP CARRIERS S.A.	783	2,464	9,346	806	11.6	83.7	11.62	–
2024	MPP CARRIERS S.A.	1,734	5,438	20,594	1,967	10.5	84.2	12.58	–
2023	not published	991	3,106	12,128	976	12.4	81.7	8.86	–
2022	not published	1,564	4,906	20,876	1,686	12.4	74.9	11.22	–
2021	not published	1,821	5,784	22,515	1,875	12.0	80.9	11.63	–
2020	not published	973	3,103	13,004	1,273	10.2	74.8	9.28	–
2019	not published	1,159	3,642	12,511	1,251	10.0	92.6	1.87	–
2018	not published	2,948	9,227	33,903	4,019	8.4	87.0	1.34	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MPP CARRIERS S.A.	11.62	7.89	+47%	2,892 of 3,610	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	MPP CARRIERS S.A.	12.58	8.09	+56%	2,567 of 3,089	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	8.86	8.27	+7%	2,015 of 3,548	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	11.22	8.71	+29%	2,837 of 3,968	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	11.63	8.57	+36%	2,693 of 3,466	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	9.28	8.24	+13%	1,959 of 3,150	RINA	B
2019	not published	1.87	8.38	−78%	34 of 3,360	RINA	B
2018	not published	1.34	8.50	−84%	24 of 3,384	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.