Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

GTM GERMANY

IMO: 9405320
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 3,230 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.99 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC
Former names: SELASSE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: South End Tanker Management B.V.

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,106 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

65.0

Chemical tanker median 88.3 kg/nm (−26%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

33.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.3 (+94%)

Average speed

9.4 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

14.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,107 t

CO₂ emitted

9,789 t

Distance sailed

47,766 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,056 h

211 days, 58% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 77.9 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−2%)

52.8Ranks 672 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 7.3 kn · median 11.1 (−34%)

8.8Faster than 4% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 75.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+405%)

7.93Ranks 1,438 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU53%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

314 t

3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GTM GERMANY
Chemical tanker median

40.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GTM GERMANY
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GTM GERMANY
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.8 kn	−25%	−46%	+4,529%	+57%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	+74%	+61%	−99%	+33%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 74%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−1%	+4%	+79%	+24%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−10%	−12%	−21%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+3.8 kn	+15%	+78%	+1%	+41%	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.5 kn	−11%	−35%	−34%	−30%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.7 kn	+13%	−4%	+79%	−25%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	South End Tanker Management B.V.	193	608	2,854	401	7.1	67.6	56.8	–
2025	Clearwater Tanker Management	1,258	3,961	16,154	2,224	7.3	77.9	75.9	–
2024	South End Tanker Management B.V.	36	114	349	34	10.1	103	48.5	–
2023	not published	2,644	8,278	44,678	4,107	10.9	59.2	36.4	–
2022	not published	1,499	4,709	24,986	2,409	10.4	60.0	29.4	–
2021	not published	2,102	6,720	31,703	2,977	10.7	66.3	33.3	–
2020	not published	1,801	5,774	31,291	4,550	6.9	57.6	23.6	–
2019	not published	3,107	9,789	47,766	5,056	9.4	65.0	33.6	–
2018	not published	1,533	4,809	26,704	2,409	11.1	57.4	45.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	South End Tanker Management B.V.	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+C
2025	Clearwater Tanker Management	75.9	15.0	+405%	1,438 of 1,460	DNV	A+B+C
2024	South End Tanker Management B.V.	48.5	16.7	+190%	1,187 of 1,274	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	36.4	16.2	+124%	1,112 of 1,314	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	29.4	16.1	+83%	1,119 of 1,409	DNV	A+C
2021	not published	33.3	16.7	+99%	1,109 of 1,343	DNV	A+C
2020	not published	23.6	16.2	+46%	945 of 1,312	DNV	A+C
2019	not published	33.6	17.3	+94%	1,090 of 1,321	DNV	A+C
2018	not published	45.0	17.1	+162%	1,167 of 1,294	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.