Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship
SEAVEN VOYAGER
- IMO
- 9405796
- Type
- Chemical tanker
- Average cargo carried
- 3,140 t
- Port of registry
- Piraeus
- Technical efficiency
- EEXI 15.85 g CO₂/t·nm
ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seaven Tanker Management Inc
2025 at a glance
From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,140 t of cargo on average.
Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025
Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.
Where the emissions happen, 2025
THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.
- Between EU ports40%
- From the EU19%
- Into the EU18%
- At berth in the EU23%
77% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,700 t).
Over the years
Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.
Fuel per mile, kg/nm
- SEAVEN VOYAGER
- Chemical tanker median
Average speed, kn
- SEAVEN VOYAGER
- Chemical tanker median
CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm
- SEAVEN VOYAGER
- Chemical tanker median
Year on year
| Year | Speed | Fuel per mile | Fuel per day | Distance | CO₂ per TW | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024→2025 | +0.1 kn | −14% | −12% | −19% | +1% | Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2023→2024 | +2.5 kn | −14% | +16% | +98% | −26% | 2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2022→2023 | −4.5 kn | +7% | −35% | −46% | −8% | 4.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2021→2022 | +0.5 kn | +26% | +31% | −28% | +27% | 0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 26%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2020→2021 | +1.3 kn | −12% | +0% | +2% | −8% | 1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2019→2020 | +2.0 kn | −12% | +11% | +0% | +23% | 2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2018→2019 | +1.1 kn | +18% | +37% | +31% | +8% | 1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.
Every reporting year
One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.
Operation
| Year | ISM company | Fuel t | CO₂ t | Distance nm | At sea h | Speed kn | Fuel kg/nm | CO₂ g/t·nm | Laden fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Seaven Tanker Management Inc | 1,112 | 3,525 | 28,600 | 3,006 | 9.5 | 38.9 | 39.26 | – |
| 2024 | Seaven Tanker Management Inc | 1,580 | 4,975 | 35,098 | 3,747 | 9.4 | 45.0 | 38.99 | – |
| 2023 | not published | 929 | 2,949 | 17,713 | 2,574 | 6.9 | 52.5 | 52.82 | – |
| 2022 | not published | 1,622 | 5,151 | 33,055 | 2,900 | 11.4 | 49.0 | 57.62 | – |
| 2021 | not published | 1,788 | 5,709 | 45,783 | 4,217 | 10.9 | 39.0 | 45.34 | – |
| 2020 | not published | 1,992 | 6,381 | 44,784 | 4,668 | 9.6 | 44.5 | 49.31 | – |
| 2019 | not published | 2,253 | 7,112 | 44,658 | 5,897 | 7.6 | 50.5 | 40.15 | – |
| 2018 | not published | 1,464 | 4,641 | 34,132 | 5,233 | 6.5 | 42.9 | 37.21 | – |
Benchmark and verification
| Year | ISM company | CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm | Chemical tanker median | vs Chemical tanker | Rank | Verifier | Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Seaven Tanker Management Inc | 39.26 | 15.04 | +161% | 1,305 of 1,460 | Bureau Veritas | A |
| 2024 | Seaven Tanker Management Inc | 38.99 | 16.73 | +133% | 1,110 of 1,274 | Bureau Veritas | A |
| 2023 | not published | 52.82 | 16.23 | +225% | 1,244 of 1,314 | Bureau Veritas | A |
| 2022 | not published | 57.62 | 16.06 | +259% | 1,370 of 1,409 | Bureau Veritas | A |
| 2021 | not published | 45.34 | 16.69 | +172% | 1,240 of 1,343 | Bureau Veritas | A |
| 2020 | not published | 49.31 | 16.16 | +205% | 1,239 of 1,312 | Bureau Veritas | A |
| 2019 | not published | 40.15 | 17.32 | +132% | 1,165 of 1,321 | Bureau Veritas | A |
| 2018 | not published | 37.21 | 17.14 | +117% | 1,102 of 1,294 | EUROCERT S.A | – |
Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.