Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

FPMC C MELODY

IMO
9406178
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
173,813 t
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EIV 2.32 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 173,813 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
232.3 kg/nm
Oil tanker median 129.1 kg/nm (+80%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
4.18
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.44 (−50%)
Average speed
11.6 kn
Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (+5%)
Fuel per day at sea
64.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
5,973 t
CO₂ emitted
18,676 t
Distance sailed
25,706 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,220 h
93 days, 25% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,797 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 232.3 kg/nm · median 129.1 (+80%)
80.4Ranks 1,736 of 1,797, lowest first192.7
Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 11.0 (+5%)
8.1Faster than 67% of oil tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 4.18 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.44 (−50%)
4.78Ranks 88 of 1,797, lowest first25.50
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports4%
  • From the EU28%
  • Into the EU56%
  • At berth in the EU12%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
11.8%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • FPMC C MELODY
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • FPMC C MELODY
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • FPMC C MELODY
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2019→2023−1.3 kn−12%−21%+66%+9%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2023not published5,97318,67625,7062,22011.6232.34.18–
2019not published4,07712,72915,4581,19912.9263.73.85–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2023not published4.188.44−50%88 of 1,797ClassNKB+C
2019not published3.858.83−56%123 of 1,919ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

FPMC C MELODY (IMO 9406178): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2019–2023 | Navalyze