Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ANCHOR 18

IMO: 9406714
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 11,063 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.03 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SUSANA S

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TAIHUA SHIPPING PTE LTD

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,068 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

78.2

Chemical tanker median 88.3 kg/nm (−11%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

27.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.3 (+57%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,522 t

CO₂ emitted

17,399 t

Distance sailed

70,619 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,965 h

290 days, 80% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 105 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+31%)

52.8Ranks 1,248 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 11.1 (−1%)

8.8Faster than 47% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 29.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+98%)

7.93Ranks 1,172 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports83%
From the EU4%
Into the EU3%
At berth in the EU10%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,716 t

9.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ANCHOR 18
Chemical tanker median

60.070.080.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

ANCHOR 18
Chemical tanker median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ANCHOR 18
Chemical tanker median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	+0.7 kn	+13%	+21%	+36%	+23%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	+39%	+35%	−42%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 39%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.5 kn	−33%	−12%	+86%	+3%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 33%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−4.2 kn	+25%	−18%	−42%	−6%	4.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.2 kn	+2%	+24%	−60%	−14%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.0 kn	−1%	−18%	−21%	+4%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TAIHUA SHIPPING PTE LTD	2,506	7,888	23,910	2,175	11.0	105	29.8	–
2023	not published	1,619	5,129	17,519	1,706	10.3	92.4	24.3	–
2022	not published	2,010	6,374	30,208	2,862	10.6	66.5	22.4	–
2021	not published	1,618	5,136	16,240	2,007	8.1	99.6	21.8	–
2020	not published	2,249	7,086	28,162	2,296	12.3	79.8	23.3	–
2019	not published	5,522	17,399	70,619	6,965	10.1	78.2	27.2	–
2018	not published	7,047	22,208	88,995	7,328	12.1	79.2	26.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TAIHUA SHIPPING PTE LTD	29.8	15.0	+98%	1,172 of 1,460	Bureau Veritas	C
2023	not published	24.3	16.2	+50%	918 of 1,314	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	22.4	16.1	+39%	981 of 1,409	DNV	C
2021	not published	21.8	16.7	+30%	907 of 1,343	DNV	C
2020	not published	23.3	16.2	+44%	933 of 1,312	DNV	C
2019	not published	27.2	17.3	+57%	999 of 1,321	DNV	C
2018	not published	26.2	17.1	+53%	968 of 1,294	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.