Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ALANGOVA

IMO: 9411927
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 8,667 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Istanbul
Technical efficiency: EIV 12.63 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Pakoil Denizcilik Ticaret

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,015 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

61.9

Chemical tanker median 85.7 kg/nm (−28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

27.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+71%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.4 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,791 t

CO₂ emitted

5,618 t

Distance sailed

28,931 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,724 h

114 days, 31% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 61.4 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−23%)

52.8Ranks 283 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.0 kn · median 11.1 (−10%)

8.8Faster than 23% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 22.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+48%)

7.93Ranks 1,021 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports31%
From the EU40%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

142 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ALANGOVA
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ALANGOVA
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ALANGOVA
Chemical tanker median

0.010,00020,00030,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+7%	+6%	−27%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	−17%	−21%	+98%	−1%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−2%	−6%	−60%	−26%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+8%	+5%	+38%	+29%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	+6%	+13%	+13%	−15%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	−2%	+22%	−42%	−10%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	+5%	+0%	+41%	−100%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Pakoil Denizcilik Ticaret	1,624	5,111	26,445	2,648	10.0	61.4	22.3	–
2024	Pakoil Denizcilik Ticaret	2,086	6,531	36,177	3,605	10.0	57.6	22.2	–
2023	not published	1,271	4,001	18,228	1,740	10.5	69.7	22.4	–
2022	not published	3,197	10,162	45,141	4,112	11.0	70.8	30.1	–
2021	not published	2,139	6,770	32,734	2,888	11.3	65.4	23.4	–
2020	not published	1,791	5,618	28,931	2,724	10.6	61.9	27.7	–
2019	not published	3,126	9,846	49,548	5,838	8.5	63.1	30.7	–
2018	not published	2,113	6,601	35,149	3,928	8.9	60.1	26,062	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Pakoil Denizcilik Ticaret	22.3	15.0	+48%	1,021 of 1,460	Verifavia	B
2024	Pakoil Denizcilik Ticaret	22.2	16.7	+33%	829 of 1,274	Verifavia	B
2023	not published	22.4	16.2	+38%	865 of 1,314	Verifavia	B
2022	not published	30.1	16.1	+87%	1,131 of 1,409	Verifavia	B
2021	not published	23.4	16.7	+40%	940 of 1,343	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	27.7	16.2	+71%	1,022 of 1,312	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	30.7	17.3	+77%	1,049 of 1,321	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	26,062	17.1	+151,952%	1,291 of 1,294	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.