Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

STOLT BRELAND

IMO: 9414084
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 22,644 t
Flag (estimated): Cayman Islands
Port of registry: George Town
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.31 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stolt Tankers BV

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 25,006 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

131

Chemical tanker median 88.3 kg/nm (+48%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.3 (−5%)

Average speed

12.7 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (+26%)

Fuel per day at sea

39.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,954 t

CO₂ emitted

9,257 t

Distance sailed

22,559 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,781 h

74 days, 20% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 107 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+34%)

52.8Ranks 1,275 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 11.1 (+4%)

8.8Faster than 61% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−2%)

7.93Ranks 711 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports19%
From the EU60%
Into the EU9%
At berth in the EU12%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,084 t

11.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STOLT BRELAND
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STOLT BRELAND
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

STOLT BRELAND
Chemical tanker median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+6%	+5%	−4%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	+11%	+8%	−56%	+22%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−15%	−8%	+9%	−17%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	−17%	−15%	+54%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.4 kn	+2%	−17%	+97%	+18%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	−4%	−0%	−47%	−14%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	+6%	+5%	−60%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Stolt Tankers BV	1,792	5,598	16,750	1,462	11.5	107	14.8	–
2024	Stolt Tankers BV	1,762	5,495	17,421	1,516	11.5	101	14.3	–
2023	not published	3,606	11,256	39,438	3,357	11.7	91.4	11.7	–
2022	not published	3,895	12,164	36,279	3,326	10.9	107	14.2	–
2021	not published	3,038	9,486	23,601	2,216	10.7	129	16.6	–
2020	not published	1,506	4,698	11,964	910	13.1	126	14.1	–
2019	not published	2,954	9,257	22,559	1,781	12.7	131	16.4	–
2018	not published	6,926	21,678	56,046	4,375	12.8	124	15.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stolt Tankers BV	14.8	15.0	−2%	711 of 1,460	DNV	B
2024	Stolt Tankers BV	14.3	16.7	−15%	530 of 1,274	DNV	B
2023	not published	11.7	16.2	−28%	340 of 1,314	DNV	B
2022	not published	14.2	16.1	−12%	565 of 1,409	DNV	B
2021	not published	16.6	16.7	−1%	667 of 1,343	DNV	B
2020	not published	14.1	16.2	−13%	495 of 1,312	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	16.4	17.3	−5%	601 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	15.0	17.1	−12%	505 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.