Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

THEO G

IMO: 9415246
Type: Bulk carrier
Port of registry: Istanbul
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.55 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC
Former names: TRUDY, THEA G

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FCN MANAGEMENT INC.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

185.1 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

11.2 kn

Fuel per day at sea

49.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

467 t

CO₂ emitted

1,482 t

1,505 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

2,526 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

226 h

9 days, 3% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 70.7 kg/nm · median 84.6 (−16%)

61.8Ranks 723 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 10.6 (+3%)

8.8Faster than 60% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.44 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+41%)

4.85Ranks 2,428 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU98%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU2%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

THEO G
Bulk carrier median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

THEO G
Bulk carrier median

10.010.511.011.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

THEO G
Bulk carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+162%	+170%	−90%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 162%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−6%	−10%	+9%	−23%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−4%	−3%	−29%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	+2%	+0%	−0%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+4%	+7%	+10%	+25%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−10%	−10%	+65%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	+7%	+9%	−62%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	FCN MANAGEMENT INC.	467	1,482	2,526	226	11.2	185.1	–	–
2025	EKA DENIZCILIK LTD. STI.	467	1,482	2,526	226	11.2	185.1	–	–
2024	FCN MANAGEMENT INC.	1,768	5,555	25,022	2,301	10.9	70.7	11.44	–
2023	not published	1,735	5,453	23,030	2,033	11.3	75.3	14.88	–
2022	not published	2,538	7,951	32,258	2,890	11.2	78.7	13.23	–
2021	not published	2,482	7,778	32,271	2,843	11.4	76.9	13.87	69%
2020	not published	2,183	6,848	29,438	2,653	11.1	74.2	11.13	–
2019	not published	1,466	4,625	17,879	1,608	11.1	82.0	12.87	–
2018	not published	3,575	11,193	46,767	4,271	10.9	76.4	13.26	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	FCN MANAGEMENT INC.	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2025	EKA DENIZCILIK LTD. STI.	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2024	FCN MANAGEMENT INC.	11.44	8.09	+41%	2,428 of 3,089	DNV	A
2023	not published	14.88	8.27	+80%	3,080 of 3,548	DNV	A
2022	not published	13.23	8.71	+52%	3,198 of 3,968	Swiss Climate	C
2021	not published	13.87	8.57	+62%	2,995 of 3,466	ABS	B
2020	not published	11.13	8.24	+35%	2,426 of 3,150	ABS	B
2019	not published	12.87	8.38	+54%	2,789 of 3,360	ABS	B
2018	not published	13.26	8.50	+56%	2,846 of 3,384	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.