Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

PRABHU LAL

IMO: 9416044
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 16,167 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.81 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CHEM POLARIS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: T-Erudite Ship Managers Pvt Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,167 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

72.1 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−10%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.98

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (−7%)

Average speed

9.4 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−15%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,610 t

CO₂ emitted

5,047 t

5,126 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

22,330 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,364 h

99 days, 27% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 72.1 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−10%)

52.8Ranks 534 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 9.4 kn · median 11.1 (−15%)

8.8Faster than 17% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.98 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (−7%)

7.93Ranks 656 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU34%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU3%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,866 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

PRABHU LAL
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PRABHU LAL
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PRABHU LAL
Chemical tanker median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	+31%	+16%	+86%	+16%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.1 kn	−25%	−7%	+19%	−50%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.2 kn	−1%	−21%	−71%	+37%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+5%	+3%	−18%	+3%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+0%	−2%	−0%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	−8%	−10%	+12%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	+10%	+6%	−5%	−5%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	T-Erudite Ship Managers Pvt Ltd	1,610	5,047	22,330	2,364	9.4	72.1	13.98	–
2024	T-Erudite Ship Managers Pvt Ltd	659	2,066	11,975	1,128	10.6	55.0	12.09	–
2023	not published	736	2,313	10,045	1,176	8.5	73.2	23.95	–
2022	not published	2,555	8,038	34,630	3,232	10.7	73.8	17.47	–
2021	not published	2,970	9,424	42,170	3,845	11.0	70.4	16.98	–
2020	not published	2,971	9,431	42,262	3,782	11.2	70.3	16.08	–
2019	not published	2,873	9,027	37,644	3,301	11.4	76.3	15.31	–
2018	not published	2,762	8,679	39,736	3,366	11.8	69.5	16.16	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	T-Erudite Ship Managers Pvt Ltd	13.98	15.04	−7%	656 of 1,460	DNV	A+C
2024	T-Erudite Ship Managers Pvt Ltd	12.09	16.73	−28%	403 of 1,274	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	23.95	16.23	+48%	905 of 1,314	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	17.47	16.06	+9%	779 of 1,409	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	16.98	16.69	+2%	693 of 1,343	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	16.08	16.16	−0%	649 of 1,312	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	15.31	17.32	−12%	532 of 1,321	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	16.16	17.14	−6%	581 of 1,294	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.