Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SEA VIBE

IMO
9416408
Type
Chemical tanker
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 4.66 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
TENACITY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TGM SHIPMANAGEMENT S.A

?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
–
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
–
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
–
Fuel per day at sea
–
Fuel consumed
0 t
CO₂ emitted
0 t
0 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
–
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
0 h
0 days, 0% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,314 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 99.5 kg/nm · median 81.9 (+21%)
55.0Ranks 1,007 of 1,314, lowest first114.9
Average speedThis ship 8.5 kn · median 11.2 (−24%)
9.1Faster than 6% of chemical tanker ships12.7
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 43.57 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.23 (+168%)
9.07Ranks 1,180 of 1,314, lowest first43.80
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

The voyage split is not in this year's report.

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
–
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • SEA VIBE
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • SEA VIBE
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • SEA VIBE
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025–––––
2023→2024–––––
2019→2023−4.2 kn−27%−51%−19%+278%4.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+1.3 kn+21%+35%−14%−27%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025TGM SHIPMANAGEMENT S.A00–0––––
2024TGM SHIPMANAGEMENT S.A00–0––––
2023not published9522,9899,5651,1218.599.543.57–
2019not published1,6145,07511,87793612.7135.911.52–
2018not published1,5424,84013,7601,20911.4112.115.80–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025TGM SHIPMANAGEMENT S.A––––Lloyd's RegisterA
2024TGM SHIPMANAGEMENT S.A––––Lloyd's Register–
2023not published43.5716.23+168%1,180 of 1,314ICS Verification ServicesA
2019not published11.5217.32−33%283 of 1,321ICS Verification ServicesA
2018not published15.8017.14−8%551 of 1,294VerifaviaA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

SEA VIBE (IMO 9416408): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze