Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

LILA MARSEILLE

IMO: 9418614
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 70,007 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.84 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: FRONT BRAGE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Front Brage Inc · part of Frontline

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 62,207 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

154

Oil tanker median 131 kg/nm (+17%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.72

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.51 (−9%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

Oil tanker median 10.9 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

38.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,598 t

CO₂ emitted

30,012 t

Distance sailed

62,493 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,956 h

248 days, 68% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 185 kg/nm · median 129 (+44%)

76.1Ranks 1,469 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 10.7 (−3%)

8.0Faster than 39% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.27 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+4%)

4.51Ranks 887 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU32%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,765 t

5.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LILA MARSEILLE
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LILA MARSEILLE
Oil tanker median

9.510.010.511.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LILA MARSEILLE
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+4%	+1%	+1%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+2%	+1%	−35%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	+14%	+17%	+10%	+3%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	+0.6 kn	−15%	−11%	+105%	−32%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+10%	+15%	−40%	+21%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	+6%	+6%	−14%	+45%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Front Brage Inc	5,710	17,874	32,571	3,263	10.0	175	8.60	–
2025	INTERNATIONAL TANKER MANAGEMENT LTD	8,287	25,934	44,795	4,317	10.4	185	8.27	–
2024	Front Brage Inc	7,914	24,743	44,501	4,144	10.7	178	7.82	–
2023	not published	12,005	37,571	68,838	6,365	10.8	174	7.98	–
2022	not published	9,598	30,012	62,493	5,956	10.5	154	7.72	–
2020	not published	5,531	17,292	30,484	3,068	9.9	182	11.4	–
2019	not published	8,330	25,995	50,480	5,292	9.5	165	9.40	–
2018	not published	9,145	28,547	58,567	6,174	9.5	156	6.47	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Front Brage Inc	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2025	INTERNATIONAL TANKER MANAGEMENT LTD	8.27	7.95	+4%	887 of 1,665	Lloyd's Register	B
2024	Front Brage Inc	7.82	8.06	−3%	851 of 1,787	DNV	B
2023	not published	7.98	8.44	−5%	818 of 1,797	DNV	B
2022	not published	7.72	8.51	−9%	841 of 1,961	DNV	B
2020	not published	11.4	9.03	+26%	1,191 of 1,870	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	9.40	8.83	+6%	1,055 of 1,919	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	6.47	8.86	−27%	495 of 1,779	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.