Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

NCC DANAH

IMO: 9419541
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 23,244 t
Flag (estimated): Saudi Arabia
Port of registry: Dammam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.19 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Bahri Ship Management DMCC

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 33,548 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

111

Chemical tanker median 83.0 kg/nm (+34%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.7 (−38%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,557 t

CO₂ emitted

4,882 t

Distance sailed

13,993 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,258 h

52 days, 14% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 114 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+43%)

52.8Ranks 1,339 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.9 kn · median 11.1 (+7%)

8.8Faster than 76% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+3%)

7.93Ranks 759 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports19%
From the EU23%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

1,436 t

92% of all fuel; 8% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

235 t

4.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NCC DANAH
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Average speed, kn

NCC DANAH
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NCC DANAH
Chemical tanker median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2025	+0.2 kn	+2%	+4%	−56%	+52%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	+0%	+6%	+129%	−2%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	−3%	−9%	−47%	+9%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−5%	+3%	+211%	+4%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.5 kn	+27%	+66%	−28%	−7%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	1,621	5,130	14,247	1,196	11.9	114	15.5	67%
2022	not published	3,568	11,254	32,016	2,728	11.7	111	10.2	75%
2021	not published	1,557	4,882	13,993	1,258	11.1	111	10.4	92%
2020	not published	3,012	9,440	26,266	2,217	11.8	115	9.57	–
2019	not published	1,020	3,186	8,459	776	10.9	121	9.19	–
2018	not published	1,111	3,465	11,721	1,404	8.4	94.8	9.91	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Bahri Ship Management DMCC	15.5	15.0	+3%	759 of 1,460	ABS	B+C
2022	not published	10.2	16.1	−36%	235 of 1,409	ABS	C
2021	not published	10.4	16.7	−38%	207 of 1,343	ABS	C
2020	not published	9.57	16.2	−41%	147 of 1,312	ABS	C
2019	not published	9.19	17.3	−47%	123 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	C
2018	not published	9.91	17.1	−42%	170 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.