Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

SEAPIKE

IMO: 9423449
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 14,244 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Bremen
Technical efficiency: EIV 7.89 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TMS "SEAPIKE" GmbH & Co KG

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 18,920 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

103

Oil tanker median 131 kg/nm (−21%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.51 (+103%)

Average speed

7.4 kn

Oil tanker median 10.9 kn (−32%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,204 t

CO₂ emitted

16,487 t

Distance sailed

50,342 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,815 h

284 days, 78% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 149 kg/nm · median 129 (+16%)

76.1Ranks 1,166 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 10.7 (−3%)

8.0Faster than 41% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 33.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+318%)

4.51Ranks 1,545 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU39%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

610 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SEAPIKE
Oil tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SEAPIKE
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SEAPIKE
Oil tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.9 kn	+31%	+21%	−16%	+56%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	−0%	+8%	+11%	+60%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+3.0 kn	+10%	+56%	−68%	−23%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−4.1 kn	−5%	−39%	+18%	−7%	4.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−11%	−6%	+6%	−13%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+9%	+12%	−23%	+16%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+2.5 kn	+16%	+51%	−2%	+22%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TMS "SEAPIKE" GmbH & Co KG	2,249	7,138	15,089	1,445	10.4	149	33.2	–
2024	TMS "SEAPIKE" GmbH & Co KG	2,047	6,464	17,969	1,589	11.3	114	21.2	–
2023	not published	1,854	5,839	16,234	1,562	10.4	114	13.3	–
2022	not published	5,204	16,487	50,342	6,815	7.4	103	17.3	–
2021	not published	4,639	14,751	42,714	3,711	11.5	109	18.6	48%
2020	not published	4,924	15,569	40,217	3,713	10.8	122	21.4	–
2019	not published	5,922	18,694	52,569	4,980	10.6	113	18.5	–
2018	not published	5,191	16,373	53,476	6,594	8.1	97.1	15.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TMS "SEAPIKE" GmbH & Co KG	33.2	7.95	+318%	1,545 of 1,665	Verifavia	A
2024	TMS "SEAPIKE" GmbH & Co KG	21.2	8.06	+164%	1,546 of 1,787	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	13.3	8.44	+58%	1,360 of 1,797	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	17.3	8.51	+103%	1,622 of 1,961	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	18.6	8.86	+110%	1,492 of 1,789	ABS	A
2020	not published	21.4	9.03	+137%	1,608 of 1,870	ABS	A
2019	not published	18.5	8.83	+110%	1,604 of 1,919	ABS	A
2018	not published	15.2	8.86	+71%	1,398 of 1,779	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.