Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

BDP SPIRIT

IMO: 9424053
Type: Chemical tanker
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EIV 12.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: LEVANA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Atlantas Ship Management Ltd

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,170 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

122

Chemical tanker median 90.2 kg/nm (+35%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

73.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.1 (+330%)

Average speed

2.5 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (−75%)

Fuel per day at sea

7.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,092 t

CO₂ emitted

6,545 t

Distance sailed

17,194 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,753 h

281 days, 77% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,274 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 79.2 kg/nm · median 80.8 (−2%)

53.8Ranks 609 of 1,274, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 9.0 kn · median 11.0 (−18%)

8.7Faster than 12% of chemical tanker ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 32.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.7 (+92%)

8.47Ranks 1,024 of 1,274, lowest first42.0

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports80%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU20%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,278 t

19.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BDP SPIRIT
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BDP SPIRIT
Chemical tanker median

2.55.07.510.012.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BDP SPIRIT
Chemical tanker median

0.025.050.075.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	−1.7 kn	−3%	−19%	+28%	−63%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.6 kn	+8%	+27%	−83%	+102%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−29%	−33%	+98%	+526%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.4 kn	−6%	+9%	+1%	−90%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.6 kn	+15%	+105%	−19%	+28%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.2 kn	−19%	+50%	+56%	−27%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Atlantas Ship Management Ltd	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	Atlantas Ship Management Ltd	767	2,406	9,676	1,078	9.0	79.2	32.1	–
2023	not published	614	1,930	7,531	702	10.7	81.6	87.1	–
2022	not published	3,287	10,252	43,670	4,783	9.1	75.3	43.1	–
2021	not published	2,355	7,361	22,081	2,282	9.7	107	6.88	–
2020	not published	2,489	7,774	21,819	2,618	8.3	114	68.2	–
2019	not published	2,663	8,323	26,869	5,770	4.7	99.1	53.4	–
2018	not published	2,092	6,545	17,194	6,753	2.5	122	73.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Atlantas Ship Management Ltd	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	C
2024	Atlantas Ship Management Ltd	32.1	16.7	+92%	1,024 of 1,274	Verifavia	C
2023	not published	87.1	16.2	+436%	1,303 of 1,314	Verifavia	C
2022	not published	43.1	16.1	+168%	1,298 of 1,409	Verifavia	C
2021	not published	6.88	16.7	−59%	21 of 1,343	Verifavia	B+C
2020	not published	68.2	16.2	+322%	1,288 of 1,312	DNV	B
2019	not published	53.4	17.3	+208%	1,251 of 1,321	DNV	B
2018	not published	73.6	17.1	+330%	1,263 of 1,294	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.