Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

REGAL RACHEL

IMO: 9424089
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.91 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: LOUISE BULKER, FLYING DUCHESS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Tamar Ship Management Ltd

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

56.8 kg/nm

General cargo median 58.7 kg/nm (−3%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

7.08

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 19.25 (−63%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

General cargo median 10.5 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

14.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,098 t

CO₂ emitted

3,425 t

3,479 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

19,339 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,794 h

75 days, 20% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,111 general cargo ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 56.8 kg/nm · median 58.7 (−3%)

34.9Ranks 521 of 1,111, lowest first87.0

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 10.5 (+3%)

7.8Faster than 56% of general cargo ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 7.08 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 19.25 (−63%)

7.51Ranks 88 of 1,111, lowest first39.26

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU66%
Into the EU27%
At berth in the EU4%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,837 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

REGAL RACHEL
General cargo median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

REGAL RACHEL
General cargo median

10.010.511.011.512.012.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

REGAL RACHEL
General cargo median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’202020’212021’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−26%	−25%	+111%	−31%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+3%	−2%	+25%	–	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	−8%	−8%	+85%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+20%	+18%	−66%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	−14%	−16%	+3,749%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+17%	+11%	−99%	–	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Tamar Ship Management Ltd	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	Tamar Ship Management Ltd	1,098	3,425	19,339	1,794	10.8	56.8	–	–
2023	not published	701	2,198	9,174	857	10.7	76.4	–	–
2022	not published	544	1,706	7,350	656	11.2	74.0	13.30	–
2021	not published	318	994	3,974	352	11.3	80.1	8.20	–
2020	not published	784	2,456	11,738	1,025	11.5	66.8	10.69	–
2019	not published	24	74	305	26	11.7	77.5	–	–
2018	not published	2,433	7,608	36,819	2,978	12.4	66.1	25.90	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Tamar Ship Management Ltd	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2024	Tamar Ship Management Ltd	7.08	19.25	−63%	88 of 1,111	Verifavia	B
2023	not published	10.27	20.67	−50%	199 of 1,045	Verifavia	B
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2021	not published	8.20	8.57	−4%	1,542 of 3,466	Verifavia	B
2020	not published	10.69	8.24	+30%	2,312 of 3,150	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	25.90	8.50	+205%	3,269 of 3,384	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.