Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

PARANA

IMO: 9427964
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 2,750 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Rostock
Technical efficiency: EEXI 19.05 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Reederei F. Laeisz G.m.b.H.

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,904 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

96.6

Vehicle carrier median 104 kg/nm (−7%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

104

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 59.0 (+76%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.2 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,620 t

CO₂ emitted

20,668 t

Distance sailed

68,543 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,336 h

222 days, 61% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 96.9 kg/nm · median 99.9 (−3%)

79.6Ranks 206 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 13.5 kn · median 14.4 (−6%)

12.0Faster than 29% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 107 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (+93%)

34.7Ranks 426 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports22%
From the EU27%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,211 t

5.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PARANA
Vehicle carrier median

95.0100.0105.0110.0115.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PARANA
Vehicle carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PARANA
Vehicle carrier median

0.0100200300400

’182018’192019’202020’212021’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	−11%	−14%	+2%	+16%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−7%	−5%	−3%	–	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	+4%	+7%	+4%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	+4%	+6%	−4%	–	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+6.3 kn	+2%	+97%	+90%	−68%	6.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−6.0 kn	+9%	−42%	−47%	+4%	6.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−2.4 kn	−2%	−17%	+291%	−66%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	Reederei F. Laeisz G.m.b.H.	6,653	20,192	68,674	5,091	13.5	96.9	107	–
2024Bio blend	Reederei F. Laeisz G.m.b.H.	7,292	21,598	67,101	4,793	14.0	109	92.2	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	8,012	676	68,858	5,022	13.7	116	2.80	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	7,383	20	66,267	4,950	13.4	112	0.10	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	7,426	7,010	68,964	5,278	13.1	108	35.0	–
2020	not published	3,839	12,043	36,313	5,354	6.8	106	108	–
2019	not published	6,620	20,668	68,543	5,336	12.8	96.6	104	–
2018	not published	1,734	5,420	17,533	1,155	15.2	98.9	303	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	Reederei F. Laeisz G.m.b.H.	107	55.4	+93%	426 of 506	DNV	B+C
2024Bio blend	Reederei F. Laeisz G.m.b.H.	92.2	55.3	+67%	277 of 335	DNV	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	35.0	59.6	−41%	14 of 459	DNV	C
2020	not published	108	57.3	+89%	391 of 449	DNV	C
2019	not published	104	59.0	+76%	366 of 426	DNV	C
2018	not published	303	62.4	+386%	433 of 434	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.