Navalyze · Container · Ship

JAIME S

IMO: 9428217
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 3,710 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Portugal
Technical efficiency: EEXI 30.18 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: SAMSKIP BLAFELL, ORION

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GS LINES TRANSPORTES MARITIMOS LDA

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,843 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

71.2

Container median 174 kg/nm (−59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

79.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+320%)

Average speed

13.6 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,842 t

CO₂ emitted

15,315 t

Distance sailed

67,966 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,005 h

209 days, 57% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 76.5 kg/nm · median 177 (−57%)

78.8Ranks 188 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 13.3 (+11%)

9.1Faster than 72% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 64.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+295%)

7.22Ranks 2,140 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports93%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,003 t

6.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

JAIME S
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

JAIME S
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

JAIME S
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.9 kn	+5%	+20%	+42%	−6%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+2.3 kn	+14%	+40%	+9%	+28%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	−14%	−13%	−13%	+38%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	+7%	+2%	−12%	−22%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	−3%	−10%	+8%	−35%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.8 kn	+1%	−12%	−36%	−4%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+3.3 kn	+2%	+36%	+20%	+61%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	GS LINES TRANSPORTES MARITIMOS LDA	4,269	13,344	55,845	3,804	14.7	76.5	64.4	–
2024part-year	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	782	2,450	10,501	1,182	8.9	74.5	105	–
2024	GS LINES TRANSPORTES MARITIMOS LDA	2,875	8,991	39,313	3,074	12.8	73.1	68.3	–
2023	not published	2,317	7,257	36,223	3,454	10.5	64.0	53.4	–
2022	not published	3,094	9,862	41,424	4,015	10.3	74.7	38.6	–
2021	not published	3,281	10,514	47,038	4,326	10.9	69.7	49.4	–
2020	not published	3,119	9,900	43,526	3,691	11.8	71.7	75.8	–
2019	not published	4,842	15,315	67,966	5,005	13.6	71.2	79.3	–
2018	not published	3,927	12,403	56,440	5,496	10.3	69.6	49.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	GS LINES TRANSPORTES MARITIMOS LDA	64.4	16.3	+295%	2,140 of 2,208	DNV	B
2024part-year	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2024	GS LINES TRANSPORTES MARITIMOS LDA	68.3	17.5	+290%	1,901 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	53.4	19.4	+175%	1,726 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	38.6	19.1	+102%	1,464 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	49.4	17.9	+176%	1,599 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	75.8	17.6	+331%	1,768 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	79.3	18.9	+320%	1,747 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	49.1	20.2	+143%	1,470 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.