Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

BLUE PRINCE

IMO: 9429182
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 45,446 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.38 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ALBANEL

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: EVERLY HOLDINGS VENTURES INC.

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 58,335 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

162

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+25%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.66

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.86 (−2%)

Average speed

11.7 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

45.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,672 t

CO₂ emitted

27,133 t

Distance sailed

53,710 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,596 h

192 days, 52% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 150 kg/nm · median 129 (+17%)

76.1Ranks 1,180 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 8.8 kn · median 10.7 (−18%)

8.0Faster than 15% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+30%)

4.51Ranks 1,097 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU36%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU16%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4,339 t

16.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BLUE PRINCE
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BLUE PRINCE
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BLUE PRINCE
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	+2%	−11%	−61%	+0%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.9 kn	−6%	+32%	+40%	+16%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−25%	−18%	−21%	−12%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−5.1 kn	+29%	−27%	−18%	+17%	5.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+4.9 kn	−18%	+42%	+262%	−28%	4.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.6 kn	+13%	−9%	−54%	−5%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−2.0 kn	+8%	−13%	−42%	+32%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	EVERLY HOLDINGS VENTURES INC.	2,869	9,026	19,152	2,182	8.8	150	10.4	–
2024	EVERLY HOLDINGS VENTURES INC.	7,123	22,294	48,502	4,804	10.1	147	10.3	93%
2023	not published	5,399	16,905	34,582	4,821	7.2	156	8.89	–
2022	not published	9,132	28,581	43,969	6,666	6.6	208	10.2	–
2021	not published	8,672	27,133	53,710	4,596	11.7	162	8.66	–
2020	not published	2,918	9,121	14,840	2,188	6.8	197	12.0	–
2019	not published	5,552	17,367	31,994	3,810	8.4	174	12.7	–
2018	not published	8,882	27,895	55,241	5,303	10.4	161	9.60	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	EVERLY HOLDINGS VENTURES INC.	10.4	7.95	+30%	1,097 of 1,665	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	EVERLY HOLDINGS VENTURES INC.	10.3	8.06	+28%	1,199 of 1,787	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	8.89	8.44	+5%	970 of 1,797	Lloyd's Register	A
2022	not published	10.2	8.51	+19%	1,214 of 1,961	RINA	A
2021	not published	8.66	8.86	−2%	869 of 1,789	RINA	A
2020	not published	12.0	9.03	+33%	1,247 of 1,870	RINA	A
2019	not published	12.7	8.83	+43%	1,382 of 1,919	RINA	A
2018	not published	9.60	8.86	+8%	993 of 1,779	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.