Navalyze · Container · Ship

ELBTEAM

IMO: 9429273
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,953 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 23.05 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: EXTERNO, ELBSEA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "Elbharmonie" GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,906 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

88.8

Container median 172 kg/nm (−48%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

57.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+224%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,633 t

CO₂ emitted

24,037 t

Distance sailed

85,937 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,208 h

259 days, 71% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 79.2 kg/nm · median 177 (−55%)

78.8Ranks 230 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.7 kn · median 13.3 (−5%)

9.1Faster than 41% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 41.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+157%)

7.22Ranks 1,910 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports81%
From the EU11%
Into the EU5%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

798 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ELBTEAM
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ELBTEAM
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ELBTEAM
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−3%	−2%	−3%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	+3%	+13%	+14%	+6%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	−8%	−0%	+14%	−17%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.8 kn	+3%	−19%	−36%	−17%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	−5%	−8%	−20%	+11%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+4%	+6%	+1%	+19%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	+2%	+14%	+20%	+8%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MS "Elbharmonie" GmbH & Co. KG	4,381	13,793	55,324	4,352	12.7	79.2	41.9	–
2024	MS "Elbharmonie" GmbH & Co. KG	4,667	14,718	56,966	4,530	12.6	81.9	45.9	–
2023	not published	3,970	12,536	49,780	4,360	11.4	79.8	43.1	–
2022	not published	3,800	12,082	43,637	4,146	10.5	87.1	52.2	–
2021	not published	5,811	18,360	68,608	5,167	13.3	84.7	63.0	–
2020	not published	7,633	24,037	85,937	6,208	13.8	88.8	57.0	–
2019	not published	7,279	23,035	85,449	6,283	13.6	85.2	48.0	–
2018	not published	5,941	18,760	71,162	5,856	12.2	83.5	44.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS "Elbharmonie" GmbH & Co. KG	41.9	16.3	+157%	1,910 of 2,208	EnvService	A
2024	MS "Elbharmonie" GmbH & Co. KG	45.9	17.5	+162%	1,698 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	43.1	19.4	+122%	1,584 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	52.2	19.1	+173%	1,635 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	63.0	17.9	+252%	1,697 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	57.0	17.6	+224%	1,662 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	48.0	18.9	+154%	1,516 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	44.5	20.2	+120%	1,408 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.