Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

NOCC ATLANTIC

IMO: 9430519
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 5,394 t
Port of registry: Oslo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.69 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NOCC SHIPOWNING AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,394 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

107.8 kg/nm

Vehicle carrier median 99.9 kg/nm (+8%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

62.80

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.36 (+13%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

36.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,980 t

CO₂ emitted

6,220 t

6,317 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

18,363 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,298 h

54 days, 15% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 107.8 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+8%)

79.6Ranks 373 of 506, lowest first119.0

Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 14.4 (−2%)

12.0Faster than 44% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 62.80 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.36 (+13%)

34.70Ranks 292 of 506, lowest first158.48

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU40%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU4%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,275 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NOCC ATLANTIC
Vehicle carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NOCC ATLANTIC
Vehicle carrier median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NOCC ATLANTIC
Vehicle carrier median

40.060.080.0100120

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	+2%	−6%	−27%	−14%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.1 kn	−8%	+7%	+427%	−28%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−6%	−2%	−80%	+52%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−18%	−15%	+1,437%	−40%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.3 kn	+30%	+18%	−92%	+96%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	−5%	−2%	−33%	−13%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.8 kn	+4%	−8%	−3%	+12%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	NOCC SHIPOWNING AS	1,980	6,220	18,363	1,298	14.1	107.8	62.80	–
2024	NOCC SHIPOWNING AS	2,647	8,344	25,151	1,637	15.4	105.2	73.27	59%
2023	not published	543	1,717	4,768	359	13.3	113.9	101.66	94%
2022	not published	2,880	9,121	23,832	1,865	12.8	120.9	66.67	–
2021	not published	228	731	1,551	125	12.4	147.0	110.42	–
2020	not published	2,224	6,983	19,628	1,438	13.7	113.3	56.20	–
2019	not published	3,479	10,888	29,083	2,200	13.2	119.6	64.45	–
2018	not published	3,454	10,823	30,014	1,995	15.0	115.1	57.80	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NOCC SHIPOWNING AS	62.80	55.36	+13%	292 of 506	Verifavia	A
2024	NOCC SHIPOWNING AS	73.27	55.31	+32%	235 of 335	ABS	A
2023	not published	101.66	56.64	+79%	370 of 417	ABS	–
2022	not published	66.67	57.66	+16%	294 of 463	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	110.42	59.57	+85%	402 of 459	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	56.20	57.26	−2%	220 of 449	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	64.45	58.95	+9%	255 of 426	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	57.80	62.35	−7%	167 of 434	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.