Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

STOC NIKE

IMO: 9431032
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 3,091 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.62 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: NIKE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: K-Ships Srl

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,091 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

49.4 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−38%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

51.28

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+241%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

12.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,064 t

CO₂ emitted

6,616 t

6,717 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

41,743 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,009 h

167 days, 46% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 49.4 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−38%)

52.8Ranks 101 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 11.1 (−6%)

8.8Faster than 31% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 51.28 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+241%)

7.93Ranks 1,388 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports80%
From the EU3%
Into the EU5%
At berth in the EU12%

96% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,355 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

11.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

STOC NIKE
Chemical tanker median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STOC NIKE
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

STOC NIKE
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−1%	+1%	−8%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−4%	−2%	−12%	+7%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−3%	−4%	+3%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+11%	+4%	−6%	−10%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−6%	−5%	−6%	+24%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.3 kn	−3%	+24%	+5%	−6%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	−10%	+3%	+23%	−8%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	K-Ships Srl	2,064	6,616	41,743	4,009	10.4	49.4	51.28	–
2024	K-Ships Srl	2,242	7,187	45,141	4,364	10.3	49.7	53.75	–
2023	not published	2,668	8,532	51,331	5,118	10.0	52.0	50.22	–
2022	not published	2,648	8,463	49,614	4,898	10.1	53.4	52.28	–
2021	not published	2,536	8,007	52,677	4,889	10.8	48.1	58.23	–
2020	not published	2,848	8,993	55,922	5,207	10.7	50.9	46.95	–
2019	not published	2,799	8,847	53,268	6,359	8.4	52.5	50.18	–
2018	not published	2,534	8,008	43,371	5,929	7.3	58.4	54.46	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	K-Ships Srl	51.28	15.04	+241%	1,388 of 1,460	DNV	A
2024	K-Ships Srl	53.75	16.73	+221%	1,213 of 1,274	DNV	A
2023	not published	50.22	16.23	+209%	1,234 of 1,314	DNV	A
2022	not published	52.28	16.06	+226%	1,350 of 1,409	DNV	A
2021	not published	58.23	16.69	+249%	1,296 of 1,343	DNV	A
2020	not published	46.95	16.16	+191%	1,225 of 1,312	DNV	A
2019	not published	50.18	17.32	+190%	1,238 of 1,321	DNV	A
2018	not published	54.46	17.14	+218%	1,222 of 1,294	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.